Specifications

University of Pretoria etd – Combrinck, M (2006)
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Depth [m]
Imaged Conductivity [S/m]
Two Layers: Layer 1, 0.02 S/m, 200 m;
Layer 2, 0.2 S/m
Two Layers: Layer 1, 0.02 S/m, 200 m;
Layer 2, 2 S/m
Two Layers: Layer 1, 50 Ohm.m, 200 m;
Layer 2, 0.5 Ohm.m (Alternative dS/dd
calculation
)
: dashed lines ne
g
ative
Figure 4-29: Imaged conductivity versus depth for two layers of increasing conductivity; first
layer thickness 200m.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Depth [m]
Imaged Conductivity [S/m]
(low contrast)
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
Imaged Conductivity [S/m]
(high contrast)
Two Layers: Layer 1, 0.02 S/m, 200 m;
Layer 2, 0.2 S/m
Two Layers: Layer 1, 50 Ohm.m, 200 m;
Layer 2, 0.5 Ohm.m (Alternative dS/dd
calculation of first data
p
oints
)
Figure 4-30: Imaged conductivity versus depth for two layers of increasing conductivity; first
layer thickness 200m – linear scale.
73