Technical information
DRV Final Evaluation Report
9
handled with anticipation of the DRV being used to retrieve it, that the machine could be
more efficient than a manual operation and considerably safer. Obviously, improvements
in the design of the machine would greatly increase the efficiency providing for a debris
removal process more efficient and safer than the current operation.
Key Points
• Debris removal plan must be in place and complete. The plan should describe
the areas and type of debris targeted for each piece of equipment. The
resources needed to support the method, and the techniques to be used.
• The operator should be in a comfortable position while performing assigned
task.
• Joysticks are easy to use and preferred by operators.
• Use of indicator lights may be replaced or complimented by text on a LCD
display or pre-recorded voice messages.
• Automated tasks should be quick and allow the operator to multitask.
• Software modes customized for different work spaces, such as working on
banked shoulders or near sound walls.
• Versatile or interchangeable end effector.
Conclusion
The importance of the field operational testing and evaluation of the DRV is the lessons
learned from observing the machine used by operators in an actual working environment.
Operators must be comfortable when operating a machine and the machine should
automate the tedious task. In addition, a well defined and executable debris removal plan
must be in place.
The debris removal plan is as important as the machine design. The debris is first
managed on the roadside before it is retrieved. Ice plant is trimmed and gathered along
with tumbleweed, loose garbage is picked up and bagged, and larger debris is stacked
along the roadside. Then, a secondary operation retrieves it from the roadside. However,
the retrieval process in the second step has to be known during the gathering process in
step one in order for the program to be efficient. In the case of using a machine to
retrieve the debris, the debris must be placed in the workspace of the equipment and in an
orientation that allows the machine to work at maximum efficiency. For example with
the current machine, debris should be placed along the roadside within the workspace of
the arm and in piles the size of the maximum payload of the clamshell. This permits
minimal effort on the placement of the end effector and maximum efficiency in the dump
cycle.
Providing a comfortable method for operating a machine reduces work place injuries and
facilitates efficiency. The operator should be able to face the task either directly or
through an electronic viewing screen. Considerations should be made at the concept
stage to plan for the operator being comfortable during the operation. The current layout
of the design required that the operator be able to run the machine with one hand while
Copyright 2011, AHMCT Research Center, UC Davis