Specifications

Table of Contents
EAA Storage Reservoirs Revised Draft PIR and EIS February 2006
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Ongoing projects likely to affect the EAA Storage Reservoirs Project ............. 1-13
Table 2-1: Results of wetland extent field survey of Compartment A by interagency
ecological team............................................................................................... 2-13
Table 2-2: List of Protected Species in the Affected Area .................................................. 2-24
Table 2-3: EAA socioeconomic characteristics................................................................... 2-45
Table 2-4: Acreage by crop in the EAA. ............................................................................ 2-47
Table 2-5: Soil Clean-up Target Levels and SQAGs (Sediment Quality Assessment
Goals) ............................................................................................................. 2-55
Table 5-1: Cost per square-foot of water stored. ................................................................. 5-11
Table 5-2: Summary of reservoir alternatives. .................................................................... 5-13
Table 5-3: Alternative 2 design summary............................................................................ 5-14
Table 5-4: Alternative 3 design summary............................................................................ 5-15
Table 5-5: Alternatives 4 and 5 design summary. ............................................................... 5-16
Table 5-6: alternative 6 design summary............................................................................. 5-17
Table 5-7: Seepage canal design summary.......................................................................... 5-21
Table 5-8: Implementation assumptions and schedule of construction............................... 5-23
Table 5-9: Alternative Plan cost estimates........................................................................... 5-27
Table 5-10: Calculation of costs used in cost-effectiveness analysis ($1000)..................... 5-29
Table 5-11: Effects Evaluation: Categories of Natural and Cultural Resources Effects....5-32
Table 5-12: Area Converted From crops To Reservoirs...................................................... 5-35
Table 5-13: Comparison of sugarcane production Lost...................................................... 5-35
Table 5-14: RECOVER performance measures used for EAA Storage Reservoirs
Project............................................................................................................. 5-37
Table 5-15: Framework for Ecosystem Condition Benchmarks.......................................... 5-41
Table 5-16: EFfect of alternative implementation upon benefits. ...................................... 5-47
Table 5-17: WRAP scores for seepage buffer habitat. ....................................................... 5-48
Table 5-18: WRAP scores for littoral shelf habitat. ........................................................... 5-48
Table 5-19: Habitat units for environmentally responsible design features. ...................... 5-48
Table 5-20: Evaluation Matrix............................................................................................. 5-54
Table 5-21: Ecological outputs (average annual habitat units) used for CE/ICA................ 5-63
Table 5-22: Results of cost-effectiveness analysis. ............................................................. 5-63
Table 5-23: Results of incremental cost analysis: cost effective and best bUy plans
arrayed by increasing output for combined habitat (all plans)....................... 5-65
Table 5-24: Habitat units for Lake Okeechobee high water performance measures
(PMs) (LO-E3 and LO-E10 SA) for the five wettest years from the
modeling period of record..............................................................................5-68
Table 5-25: Volume of backpumping in acre-feet from the Everglades Agricultural
Area into Lake Okeechobee through the S-2 and S-3 pump structures for
EAASR project alternatives. ..........................................................................
5-68
Table 5-26: Habitat units for St. Lucie Estuary for performance measure of reduction in
Lake Okeechobee regulatory releases (LORR) from the modeling period
of record. ........................................................................................................ 5-69
Table 5-27: Categorized data for the Caloosahatchee Estuary Performance Measure........ 5-69