Specifications

Avoid prolonged or repeated skin contact.
A1.2 Tetralin
Warning—Combustible. Vapor harmful. In animal tests,
repeated oral or inhalation exposures caused liver and kidney
damage and the formation of eye cataracts.
Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flame.
Keep container closed.
Use with adequate ventilation.
Avoid breathing vapor or spray mist.
Avoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin.
A1.3 Acetone
Warning—Extremely flammable. Vapors may cause flash
fire.
Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flame.
Keep container closed.
Use with adequate ventilation.
Avoid build-up of vapors, and eliminate all sources of
ignition, especially nonexplosionproof electrical apparatus and
heaters.
Avoid prolonged breathing of vapor or spray mist.
Avoid contact with eyes or skin.
A1.4 Toluene
Warning—Flammable. Vapor harmful.
Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flame.
Keep container closed.
Use with adequate ventilation.
Avoid breathing of vapor or spray mist.
Avoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin.
A1.5 Methanol (methyl alcohol)
Warning—Flammable. Vapor harmful. May be fatal or
cause blindness if swallowed or inhaled. Cannot be made
nonpoisonous.
Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flame.
Keep container closed.
Avoid contact with eyes and skin.
Avoid breathing of vapor or spray mist.
Use with adequate ventilation.
Do not take internally.
APPENDIX
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1. SMOKE POINT-LUMINOMETER NUMBER RELATIONSHIP
X1.1 Introduction
X1.1.1 There is a good correspondence between smoke
point (SP) (Test Method D 1322) and luminometer number
(LN) (Test Method D 1740). Fig. X1.1 shows this relationship
for aviation turbine fuels of the kerosine type.
X1.1.2 The relationship is based on regression of data on
315 fuels having luminometer numbers falling within the range
from −2 to 100. There were 160 Jet A, A-1, JP-4, and JP-5 fuels
in this group. The remaining fuels were diesel fuels, kerosines,
blends of refinery fractions, and other miscellaneous petroleum
fractions.
X1.1.3 The correlation coefficient was 0.95.
X1.1.4 It can be demonstrated that the confidence intervals
about the correlation line is explainable almost completely by
the inherent error in the smoke point and luminometer mea-
surements. This means that if there is a fuel-type effect
different for each of the two methods, it is small and masked by
smoke point and luminometer number measurement errors.
X1.2 Equations
X1.2.1 The correlation curve shown in Fig. X1.1 can be
represented by either equation as follows:
LN 5212.03 1 3.009SP 2 0.0104SP
2
(X1.1)
SP 514.16 1 0.331LN 1 0.000648LN
2
X1.2.2 The equations are obviously not mathematical iden-
tities but yield results that do not differ by more than 0.1 smoke
point or luminometer number points. Both equations are
presented to facilitate ease of calculation depending on which
variable is given.
D1740–01
6