User's Manual
Table Of Contents
- Introduction
- The Integrator’s Task
- Installing the Modem
- Using the Modem Test Jig
- Testing
- Desense
- Application Development
- Message Routing and Migration
- Appendix A - NCL Interface
- Appendix B - Software Development Kit
- SDK Contents
- System Requirements
- SDK Software Architecture
- NCL Application Programmer’s Interface
- Implementation
- Logical Architecture
- Application Interface
- Opening a Session
- Close Session
- Send Data to a Radio Host
- Receive Data From RPM
- Get RPM Status Information
- Set Configuration ITEMS Within the RPM
- Reset RPM
- Register Event Callback Function
- Enable / Disable Events
- Get Error Description
- Register Wakeup Application
- Deregister Wakeup Application
- Switch RPM On/Off
- Send Generic NCL Command To RPM
- Get Software Version
- SCR Application Programmer’s Interface
- A
- Appendix C – Sample programs
- Appendix D - Wavenet Application Loader
- Appendix E - Numeric Conversion Chart
- Appendix F - Specifications
- Appendix H - Glossary
Desense __________________________________________________ Boomer II User Manual & Integrator’s Guide
Wavenet Technology 76 BM210012WT27
important. If the source is narrow-band, it has less effect than one
occupying the entire channel bandwidth. The method is not effective in
determining desensitisation at IF frequencies or from less obvious
sources such as mixed products. The method provides information on
how much effort, if any, needs to occur to resolve desense problems.
This method is useful when connection of the wireless card is not yet
facilitated by the platform. This measurement could be performed
without the wireless card present. This method determines the
magnitude of the emissions, without extensive test facility
requirements.
Methods of Controlling Emissions
Preferred methods of controlling emissions observe that the emissions
must be contained to a level 40dB less than the FCC Part 15
requirements. For WAN (Wide Area Network) products, the accepted
method of achieving this is to shield.
Through past experience, it has become evident that standard
techniques used to achieve FCC certification are not enough to satisfy
wireless communications. Engineering teams logically attempt an array
of decoupling, partial shielding, and PCB layout methods, which
produce incremental improvements, but do not achieve the emission
control requirements. Hybrid methods of shielding and source
reduction are often a good approach.
Important: Unless the host platform is already close to the goals set
out in this document, source reduction efforts may only drive up the
direct materials cost of the product and not increase return on that
investment.
If a compromise is chosen where the target levels are not the goal,
standard EMI techniques can be of value. For narrowband emissions,
some form of clock frequency “pulling” or control can be
implemented.
Shielding Approach
The mechanical design of the host product must allow the EMC
engineers to create a Faraday Box shield design. This is an electrically
continuous shielded enclosure. If designed properly, such an enclosure
easily attenuates radiated signals from the host device.
The shield approach appears to be a big step at first. The advantage is
that the shield will minimise the possible redesign required of the host
PCB platform and circuitry.
For a thorough discussion of shielded enclosure design, an excellent
reference is Electromagnetic Compatibility: Principles and
Applications by David A Weston. The publisher is Marcel Dekker,
Inc. 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016. Any well written
text on EMI control should cover the design of shielded enclosures.