Datasheet
SLOS237B− MAY 1999 − REVISED FEBRUARY 2000
9
POST OFFICE BOX 655303 • DALLAS, TEXAS 75265
TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Figure 30
−40
−50
−60
−70
−100
−80
−90
DISTORTION
vs
FREQUENCY
f − Frequency − Hz
20M10M100k 1M
Distortion − dB
3rd Harmonic
2nd Harmonic
V
CC
= ±5 V
Gain = 2
R
L
= 1 kΩ
V
O(pp)
= 2 V
Figure 31
DISTORTION
vs
OUTPUT VOLTAGE
V
O
− Output Voltage − V
Distortion (dB)
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
V
CC
= ±15 V
Gain = 5
R
L
= 150 Ω
f = 1 MHz
−40
−50
−70
−90
0 5 10 15 20
−80
−60
Figure 32
DISTORTION
vs
OUTPUT VOLTAGE
V
O
− Output Voltage − V
Distortion (dB)
2nd Harmonic
3rd Harmonic
V
CC
= ±15 V
Gain = 5
R
L
= 1 kΩ
f = 1 MHz
−50
−60
−70
−80
−100
50101520
−90
Figure 33
DIFFERENTIAL GAIN
vs
NUMBER OF 150-Ω LOADS
0.3
0.2
12 3
Number of 150-Ω Loads
0.1
Differential Gain − %
0
0.4
0.5
Gain = 2
R
F
= 1.3 kΩ
40 IRE-NTSC Modulation
Worst Case ±100 IRE Ramp
V
CC
= ±15 V
V
CC
= ±5 V
Figure 34
DIFFERENTIAL PHASE
vs
NUMBER OF 150-Ω LOADS
0.15°
0.1°
12 3
Number of 150-Ω Loads
0.05°
0°
0.2°
0.25°
V
CC
= ±15 V
V
CC
= ±5 V
Differential Phase
0.35°
0.3°
0.4°
Gain = 2
R
F
= 1.3 kΩ
40 IRE-NTSC Modulation
Worst Case ±100 IRE Ramp
Figure 35
DIFFERENTIAL GAIN
vs
NUMBER OF 150-Ω LOADS
0.3
0.2
12 3
Number of 150-Ω Loads
0.1
Differential Gain − %
0
0.4
0.5
V
CC
= ±15 V
V
CC
= ±5 V
0.6
Gain = 2
R
F
= 1.3 kΩ
40 IRE-PAL Modulation
Worst Case ±100 IRE Ramp
Figure 36
DIFFERENTIAL PHASE
vs
NUMBER OF 150-Ω LOADS
0.15°
0.1°
12 3
Number of 150-Ω Loads
0.05°
0°
0.2°
0.25°
V
CC
= ±15 VV
CC
= ±5 V
Differential Phase
0.35°
0.3°
0.4°
Gain = 2
R
F
= 1.3 kΩ
40 IRE-PAL Modulation
Worst Case ±100 IRE Ramp
Figure 37
f − Frequency − Hz
1G10M100k 1M 100M
Z
O
− Output Impedance − Ω
CLOSED-LOOP
OUTPUT IMPEDANCE
vs
FREQUENCY
100
10
1
0.1
V
CC
= ±5 V & ±15 V
Gain = 2
R
F
= 1 kΩ
Figure 38
PSRR
vs
FREQUENCY
f − Frequency − Hz
100M10M100k 1M
PSRR − Power Supply Rejection Ratio − dB
40
V
CC
= ±15 V & ±5 V
+V
CC
& −V
CC
Responses
50
60
70
80
30
20
10
0