Datasheet

3.0 ÛH
10 ÛF
4.7 ÛF
LM3208
SNVS404B APRIL 2006REVISED MARCH 2013
www.ti.com
Figure 37. Evaluation Board Layout
Board Layout Flow
1. Minimize C1, PV
IN
, and PGND loop. These traces should be as wide and short as possible. This is the
highest priority.
2. Minimize L1, C2, SW and PGND loop. These traces also should be wide and short. This is the second
priority.
3. The above layout patterns should be placed on the component side of the PCB to minimize parasitic
inductance and resistance due to via-holes. It may be a good idea that the SW to L1 path is routed between
C1(+) and C1(–) land patterns. If vias are used in these large current paths, multiple via-holes should be
used if possible.
4. Connect C1(–), C2(–) and PGND with wide GND pattern. This pattern should be short, so C1(–), C2(–), and
PGND should be as close as possible. Then connect to a PCB common GND pattern with as many via-holes
as possible.
5. SGND should not connect directly to PGND. Connecting these pins under the device should be avoided. (If
possible, connect SGND to the common port of C1(–), C2(–) and PGND.)
6. V
DD
should not be connected directly to PV
IN
. Connecting these pins under the device should be avoided. It
is good idea to connect V
DD
to C1(+) to avoid switching noise injection to the V
DD
line.
7. The FB line should be protected from noise. It is a good idea to use an inner GND layer (if available) as a
shield.
NOTE
The evaluation board shown in Figure 37 for the LM3208 was designed with these
considerations, and it shows good performance. However some aspects have not been
optimized because of limitations due to evaluation-specific requirements. The board can
be used as a reference. Please refer questions to a TI representative.
18 Submit Documentation Feedback Copyright © 2006–2013, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Product Folder Links: LM3208