Datasheet
Table Of Contents
- Figure 1. Block diagram
- 1 Description
- 2 Maximum ratings
- 3 Pin connection
- 4 Electrical characteristics
- 5 Typical electrical performance
- Figure 3. IC consumption vs. VCC
- Figure 4. IC consumption vs. TJ
- Figure 5. VCC Zener voltage vs. TJ
- Figure 6. Startup and UVLO vs. TJ
- Figure 7. Feedback reference vs. TJ
- Figure 8. E/A output clamp levels vs. TJ
- Figure 9. UVLO saturation vs. TJ
- Figure 10. OVP levels vs. TJ
- Figure 11. Inductor saturation threshold vs. TJ
- Figure 12. Vcs clamp vs. TJ
- Figure 13. ZCD sink/source capability vs. TJ
- Figure 14. ZCD clamp level vs. TJ
- Figure 15. R discharge vs. TJ
- Figure 16. Line drop detection threshold vs. TJ
- Figure 17. VMULTpk - VVFF dropout vs. TJ
- Figure 18. PFC_OK threshold vs. TJ
- Figure 19. PFC_OK FFD threshold vs. TJ
- Figure 20. Multiplier characteristics at VFF = 1 V
- Figure 21. Multiplier characteristics at VFF = 3 V
- Figure 22. Multiplier gain vs. TJ
- Figure 23. Gate drive clamp vs. TJ
- Figure 24. Gate drive output saturation vs. TJ
- Figure 25. Delay to output vs. TJ
- Figure 26. Start-up timer period vs. TJ
- 6 Application information
- 7 Application examples and ideas
- Figure 34. Demonstration board EVL6564-100W, wide-range mains: electrical schematic
- Figure 35. L6564 100W TM PFC: compliance to EN61000-3-2 standard
- Figure 36. L6564 100W TM PFC: compliance to JEITA-MITI standard
- Figure 37. L6564 100 W TM PFC: input current waveform at 230 - 50 Hz - 100 W load
- Figure 38. L6564 100W TM PFC: input current waveform at 100 V - 50 Hz - 100 W load
- 8 Package mechanical data
- 9 Order codes
- 10 Revision history

Application information L6564
22/33 DocID16202 Rev 5
6.4 THD optimizer circuit
The L6564 device is provided with a special circuit that reduces the conduction dead-angle
occurring to the AC input current near the zero-crossings of the line voltage (crossover
distortion). In this way the THD (total harmonic distortion) of the current is considerably
reduced.
A major cause of this distortion is the inability of the system to transfer energy effectively
when the instantaneous line voltage is very low. This effect is magnified by the high-
frequency filter capacitor placed after the bridge rectifier, which retains some residual
voltage that causes the diodes of the bridge rectifier to be reverse-biased and the input
current flow to temporarily stop.
To overcome this issue the device forces the PFC preregulator to process more energy near
the line voltage zero-crossings as compared to that commanded by the control loop. This
will result in both minimizing the time interval where energy transfer is lacking and fully
discharging the high-frequency filter capacitor after the bridge.
Figure 30 shows the internal block diagram of the THD optimizer circuit.
Figure 30. THD optimizer circuit
$0Y
08/7
&203
W
#9DF
#9DF!9DF
W
W
WR3:0
FRPSDUDWRU
08/7,3/,(5
2))6(7
*(1(5$725
W
9))
9
W
W
08/7
&203
W
#9DF
#9DF!9DF
W
W
WR3:0
FRPSDUDWRU
08/7,3/,(5
2))6(7
*(1(5$725
W
9))
9
W
W
08/7
&203
W
#9DF
#9DF!9DF
W
W
WR3:0
FRPSDUDWRU
08/7,3/,(508/7,3/,(5
2))6(7
*(1(5$725
2))6(7
*(1(5$725
W
9))
9
9
W
W