Technical information

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1.1: Breakdown of axle properties for an ‘average’ NCAT truck (Priest and

Timm, 2006) ................................................................................................................. 2-3

Table 2.2.1: HMA design parameters for mixes 1 to 4 (Timm and Priest, 2006) ........................ 2-8

Table 2.3.1: Resilient modulus of subgrade soil with average compaction level of

96%. Raw test results from laboratory reports ........................................................... 2-10

Table 2.3.2: Resilient modulus of aggregate base with average compaction level of

93%. Raw test results from laboratory reports ........................................................... 2-11

Table 2.3.3: Average complex modulus test results for Mix 1 (Barde and Cardone,

2004) ........................................................................................................................... 2-14

Table 2.3.4: Average complex modulus test results for Mix 2 (Barde and Cardone,

2004) ........................................................................................................................... 2-15

Table 2.3.5: Average complex modulus test results for Mix 3 (Barde and Cardone,

2004) ........................................................................................................................... 2-16

Table 2.3.6: Average complex modulus test results for Mix 4 (Barde and Cardone,

2004) ........................................................................................................................... 2-17

Table 2.3.7: FWD deflections at N1 section (location according to NCAT database:

station 2 inside the wheel path) .................................................................................. 2-19

Table 2.3.8: FWD deflections at N2 section (location according to NCAT database:

station 2 inside the wheel path) .................................................................................. 2-19

Table 2.5.1: Temperature profile in Section N1 for analysis of resilient response data ............. 2-24

Table 2.5.2: Tabulated progression of N1 and N2 rutting levels vs. number of applied

ESALs ......................................................................................................................... 2-31

Table 3.3.1: Resilient modulus of unbound materials (calibrated equation 3.3.2

parameters) ................................................................................................................... 3-9

Table 3.3.2: Complex modulus analysis results for a reference temperature of 15.5ºC

based on the approach in Levenberg and Shah (2008) ............................................... 3-13

Table 3.3.3: Peak FWD deflections measured in the center of sections n1 and n2 .................... 3-17

Table 3.4.1: APT pass application log for sections n1 and n2 (original structure) .................... 3-18

Table 3.4.2: APT pass application log for Section n2 (rehabilitated structure) ......................... 3-19

Table 3.4.3: APT pass application log for Section n1 (rehabilitated structure) ......................... 3-20

Table 3.5.1: Location of APT instrumentation in Section n1 (relate to Figure 3.5.1) ................ 3-25

Table 4.2.1: Backcalculated layer moduli for pass #5,000 and pass #80,000 ............................ 4-10

Table 4.3.1: Combined complex modulus properties for APT n1 / NCAT N1 (based

on equations 4.3.1 to 4.3.4) ........................................................................................ 4-16

Table 4.3.2: Matching errors between isotropic LET predictions and NCAT measured

responses. Errors are in percent after normalization using the corresponding

peak to peak response shown in brackets (in microstrains) ........................................ 4-23