MX-M503N/U/M453N/U/M363N/U/283N Sales-Guide GB
Table Of Contents
- Introduction
- Market Analysis
- Product Positioning
- Sales Approach
- Competitive Comparison
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR2025i
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR2030i
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR3225N
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 282
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-2540
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-2560
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-3040
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Kyocera KM-3060
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2510
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3010
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2550B
- Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 2550
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Canon iR3235
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Canon iR3235N
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 361
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 362
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Kyocera KM-4050
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3350B
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3350
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 3500
- Sharp MX-M363U & MX-M363N Vs. Toshiba e-Studio 353
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Canon iR3245
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Canon iR3245N
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 421
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Kyocera KM-4050
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4000B
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4000
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 4500
- Sharp MX-M453U & MX-M453N Vs. Toshiba e-Studio 453
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Konica Minolta Bizhub 501
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Kyocera KM-5050
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 5000B
- Sharp MX-M503U & MX-M503N Vs. Ricoh Aficio MP 5000
- Features List
- Specifications
- Configurations
43
M
M
X
X
-
-
M
M
5
5
0
0
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
4
4
5
5
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
M
M
X
X
-
-
M
M
3
3
6
6
3
3
N
N
/
/
U
U
2
2
8
8
3
3
N
N
S
S
a
a
l
l
e
e
s
s
G
G
u
u
i
i
d
d
e
e
Sharp MX-M283N Vs. Canon iR3225N
Manufacturer SHARP Canon Manufacturer SHARP Canon
Model MX-M283N iR3225N Model MX-M283N iR3225N
Launch Date June 2009 August 2008 Document Feeder Std Std
Also Sold As N/A N/A Type RSPF DADF
Multifunctionality Std Std Capacity 100 100
Network Printer Std Std Network Printer Std Std
Network Scanning Std Opt Print/min. (ppm) 28 25
Fax Opt Opt Print Resolution 1200x1200dpi 1200x1200dpi
Base Engine Desktop Desktop Confidential Print Std Std
Paper Max. Size A3W A3 XPS Opt No
Total Cassettes Std. 2 2 Postscript Opt Opt
Total Cassettes Max. 5 5 PCL 5e, 6 Std 5e, 6 Std
Total Sheets Std. 1,100 1,150 Apple Opt Opt
Max. Paper Sheets 5,600 4,950 Print Std. Mem. MB 1Gb 1,256mb (shared)
No of sheets (Bypass) 100 50 Print Max Mem. MB
2Gb 1,768mb (shared)
gsm - Tray (bypass) 209 (209) 90 (128) USB Std Std
Duplex Std (209gsm) Std Gigabit Ethernet Std Std
Warm up time (secs) 20 30 Fax Opt Opt
Copier Std Std Super G3 Yes Yes
Copy/min. (cpm) 28 25 JBIG Compression Yes Yes
FCOT (secs) 4.6 4.9 i-Fax Opt Yes
Max. Original Size A3 A3 Network Scanning Std Opt
Max. Qty. Select 999 999 Type Colour Colour
Scanner Resolution 600x600 600x600 Resolution 600x600 600x600
Zoom Range 25-400% 25-400% Destinations
Desktop/FTP/email/
SMB/USB
Email/I-FAX/SMB/FTP/
WebDAV/iWDM
Copier Std. Mem. MB 640mb 1256mb (shared) Functionality Sharpdesk
Copier Max. Mem. MB 640mb 1768mb (shared) Document Filing Std No
HDD Std (80Gb) Std (60Gb) Finishing Opt Opt
e-Sort Std Std Max Capacity (sheets)
4,000 1,600
Account Numbers 1,000 1,000 Auto Stapler Yes Yes
Machine Size (WxDxH) 645x695x953 565x700x901 Max Sheets Stapled 50 50
Job Programs 48 9 Offset Stacking Yes Yes
Advantages of Sharp MX-M283N Advantages of Canon iR3225N
• Faster output
• Larger paper support
• Higher max. paper capacity
• Higher capacity bypass tray
• Heavier paper support (trays & bypass)
• Faster warm-up time
• Faster FCOT
• Larger HDD capacity
• Separate print and copy memory
• More job programs
• XPS printing option
• More printer memory available
• Scan to / print from USB port
• Document Filing
• Higher capacity finisher
• Higher std paper capacity (1150 sheets vs 1100)
• More print and copy memory, albeit shared
• Smaller footprint