User's Manual
Table Of Contents
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
 - Model R-122V Vacuum Tube Ribbon Microphone
 - Introduction
 - Active Ribbon Technology
 - Description
 - Applications
 - Ribbons in the Digital World
 - User Guide
 - Using the R-122V vacuum tube Ribbon Microphone
 - Power Supply Input Module
 - Operation
 - Amplification Considerations
 - The Sweet Spot
 - Finding and Working with the Sweet Spot
 - Proximity Effect and Working Distance
 - The Sound That Is “More Real than Real”
 - Microphone Techniques
 - General Tips for Using the Royer R-122V
 - Stereophonic Microphone Techniques
 - Specialized Recording Techniques
 - Recording on the Back Side of the R-122V
 - Care & Maintenance
 - Troubleshooting
 - Features
 - Electrical Specifications
 - Mechanical Specifications
 - Polar Pattern
 - Frequency Response
 - Warranty
 
square law. The inverse square  law states  that for  each halving  of  source-to-microphone 
distance, the sound pressure level quadruples. 
Other Types of Microphones
For the same ratio of direct to reverberant sound, omni-directional microphones must be closer to 
the sound source than cardioid or bi-directional microphones. Microphones should generally face 
the sound source head-on; if not, treble losses due to phase cancellation can result. The exception 
here is for large diaphragm condenser microphones, which often give the flattest response at an 
angle of about 10-20 degrees (off axis), where phase loss and diffraction effect offset each other 
somewhat.
Proximity Effect and Working Distance
The Sound That Is “More Real than Real”
Ribbon microphones have long been renowned for rich bass. This effect is largely due to the fact 
that ribbon microphones generally have excellent bass response to begin with, and at the same 
time exhibit an effect known as proximity effect.
As illustrated in the following graph, a typical bi-
directional   ribbon   microphone   will   have   a   flat 
frequency response at a  distance of about  six feet 
from  the  microphone,   but   at  shorter  distances   the 
bass response becomes boosted; the effect becomes 
increasingly pronounced as the distance between the 
microphone and the sound source is reduced.
This bass-boosting characteristic can become quite 
intense   and,   if   desired,   can   be   corrected   by 
equalization.   However,   for   a   multiple  microphone 
setup,   the   pronounced   bass   boosting   (due   to 
proximity effect) can be turned to an advantage. If 
an instrument, such as a trumpet, is extremely close-
miked and the bass is  cut to restore flat response, 
unwanted   low-frequency   sounds   are   cut   back   by 
upwards   of   20dB   compared   to   an   unequalized 
microphone with a flat response. This discrimination 
is independent of the microphone’s polar response.
Another area where proximity effect can be turned to an advantage is to make things sound more 
“real than real.” For example, many voices and certain musical instruments produce fundamental 
frequencies within the bass range (below 150Hz  or so) but the fundamentals are weak. If a 
microphone that has no proximity effect and a rising high frequency response is used on an 
upright piano, or on a person with a thin, weak voice, the recorded sound is likely to sound even 
thinner than it was in real life. In contrast, using a microphone with strong proximity effect on 
12
Typical relationship of microphone distance 
to frequency response for ribbon-velocity 
bidirectional microphone.










