QwikSEER White Paper
Copyright © Mainstream Engineering Corporation, Rockledge, FL  Page 4 
evaporator  coil  only  increases  the  compressor  lift  by  about  a  degree  or  less  (i.e.,  lowers  the 
evaporator  temperature  by  1  degree  or  less),  then  we  have  found  that  the  savings  in  power 
consumption  by  the  blower  motor  is  greater  than  the  increased  power  consumption  of  the 
compressor, the  difference being the  energy saved.  This  is  in  part because  the  motor  power 
curve for the compressor is relatively flat, that is an unloaded compressor motor draws almost 
the same power as a loaded motor. This is why we see the most benefit at very low lift, which 
also happens to be the place where the typical A/C operates most. 
The best way to illustrate this effect is with a specific case.  For a 5 HP compressor motor, the 
electric motor is about 90% efficient at full load, but only about 30% efficient at 10% of full 
load.  Therefore for a full load of  5 HP (3728 W), the motor power consumption is 4142 W 
(3728/0.90), but  at 10%  load (0.5  HP  or 372.8 W), the  power draw is  1,242 W  (372.8/0.3).  
Increasing the load on the compressor by a factor of 10 (from 0.5 HP to 5 HP), only increased 
the  power  draw  by  a  factor  of  3.3  and  not  by  a  factor  of  10.    Therefore,  increasing  the 
compressor  motor  load  a  little  (by  reducing  the  fan  speed  and  increasing  the  lift  by  only  1 
degree) does not increase the compressor power draw very much (does not increase it linearly), 
but it reduces the blower motor power draw linearly (since different winding have been activated 
on the blower motor to keep the efficiency constant). The net result is a reduction in the total 
energy consumed by the A/C unit. 
A high latent load (lots of humidity) in the conditioned air makes the positive effects of reducing 
the airflow even better, since a smaller fraction of the cooling is supplied by sensible air cooling. 
The lower airflow allows more residence time for the moisture to be removed from the air and 
the lower temperature coil, increases the moisture removal 
Installation Effects 
The installation-specific effects are related to the configuration of the supply ducts and the return 
air ducts, and the type of blower motor. The pressure drop in the supply air ducting can differ 
from installation to installation and can even change over time in a single installation because of 
changes to the supply register settings. Similarly, the pressure drop in the return air ducting can 
differ  from  installation  to  installation  and  can  also  change  over  time  in  a  single  installation 
because of  changes in  the  pressure drop  across the  air filter  (due to  changes in  the type and 
cleanliness of the air filter). 
The  type  of  blower  motor  affects  how  dramatically  a  change  in  pressure  drop  affects  the 
evaporator airflow. Constant blower motor speed is not the same as constant airflow rate. 
PSC Motors 
Different PSC motor speed taps correlate to different motor speeds. Once a technician selects a 
speed tap, the PSC motor operates at a single speed. The resulting airflow that is achieved at a 
selected speed is greatly affected by the pressure drop in the ductwork. Therefore, the likelihood 
that the actual airflow achieved in a specific installation is the design airflow specified by the 
manufacturer is unlikely. This configuration cannot alter the airflow as the environmental effects 
change  (outdoor  air  temperature,  return  air  temperature,  and  humidity).  To  ensure  adequate 
airflow in the worst environmental conditions, excess airflow is typically supplied. 







