Datasheet

2
Automotive Capabilities
Optimal Solutions for Innovation
in the Car of the Future
Commitment to the Relentless Quest for Perfection
Microchip’s Automotive Solutions
The automotive industry continues to be a challenging environment.
Intense competition drives automotive OEMs to seek innovative
solutions to differentiate their vehicles, which in today’s market are
not only required to provide safe and reliable transportation, but
must also offer the functionality to entertain, inform, and connect
to the outside world. Advanced technology is required to enable
the delivery of these new features without compromising cost
and weight.
As automotive system suppliers race to address the rigorous
and constantly changing requirements of automotive OEMs, the
evolution of alternatives for the electrical/electronic architecture
also continues. The demands of global automotive customers create
many new challenges and opportunities for innovation.
With many years of experience in delivering embedded solutions to global automotive customers, Microchip Technology
has a proven track record in the automotive market. Our broad portfolio of products, development tools, and design
support enable creative and advanced solutions which allow automotive OEMs to deliver vehicles that offer reduced fuel
consumption and lower emissions as well as a safer, more comfortable experience on the road for the vehicle occupants.
Quality and Reliability
With nearly 20 years of experience in serving the demanding requirements of the automotive market, Microchip Technology
has a proven track record of successfully delivering cost-effective and reliable total product solutions to our valued customers.
AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS GROUP
8-D REPORT
DATE: August 28, 2007
SUBJECT: defect VIA
REVISION: A
FA #: C070816
MICROCHIP P/N: 24LC16B
Trace Code: 06443WV
MASK NO.: C5AR3
CUSTOMER: TRW
Customer Part #: 59141550
Customer Tracking Number: 204115
1. USE TEAM APPROACH:
Andy Birrell - Yield Enhancement Engineering Manager
Roger Melcher - Wafer Manufacturing Engineer
Anupam Menghal - APG Quality Engineer
Craig Comeaux - Failure Analysis Engineer
Steve Vernier - APG Product Engineer
2. DESCRIBE PROBLEM:
One 24LC16B device was returned when the customer reported that device is
failed in end user applications. The device failure has been confirmed during
bench testing as well as ATE testing. All the pins appeared normal during initial
curve tracing. Bench testing revealed that the device was drawing abnormally
high current. It is also confirmed that the multiple addresses in array are flipping
with each read. The ATE testing also revealed that the returned unit may have
failed the parametric or functional tests.
Andy Birrell - Yield Enhancement Engineering Manager
customer reported that device is
failed in end user applications. The device failure has been confirmed during
All the pins appeared normal during initial
that the device was drawing abnormally
he multiple addresses in array are flipping
vealed that the returned unit may have
Andy Birrell - Yield Enhancement Engineering Manager
customer reported that device is
failed in end user applications. The device failure has been confirmed during
All the pins appeared normal during initial
that the device was drawing abnormally
he multiple addresses in array are flipping
vealed that the returned unit may have
Part Submission Warrant
Part Name Cust. Part Number
Shown on Drawing Number Orig. Part Number
Engineering Change Level Dated
Additional Engineering Changes
N/A Dated
Safety and/or Government Regulation Purchase Order No.
N/A
Checking Aid Number Checking Aid Eng. Change Level Dated
ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION CUSTOMER SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Organization Name & Supplier/Vendor Code Customer Name/Division
Street Address Buyer/Buyer Cod
e
USA
City Region Postal Code Country Application
MATERIALS REPORTING
Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported?
Submitted by IMDS or other customer format:
Are polymeric parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes?
REASON FOR SUBMISSION (Check at least one)
Initial submission Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change(s) Sub-Supplier or Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts produced at Additional Location
Tooling Inactive > than 1 year Other - please specify
REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one)
Level 1 - Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval Report) submitted to customer.
Level 2 - Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 3 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 4 - Warrant and other requirements as defined by customer.
Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at organization's manufacturing location.
SUBMISSION RESULTS
The results for
These results meet all design record requirements: (If "NO" - Explanation Required)
Mold / Cavity / Production Process
N/A
DECLARATION
EXPLANATION/COMMENTS:
Is each Customer Tool properly tagged and numbered?
Organization Authorized Signature Date
Print Name
Title Corporate Quality E-mail
FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY (IF APPLICABLE)
PPAP Warrant Disposition:
Customer Signature Date
Print Name Customer Tracking Number (optional)
N/A
N/A
Weight (kg)
Pb-Free N/A N/A
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts, which were made by a process that meets all Production
Part Approval Process Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I further affirm that these samples were produced at the production rate of
_N/A
___/_N/A___ hours. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for your review. I have noted any
deviation from this declaration below.
Chandler Arizona 85224
2355 W Chandler Blvd.
Microchip Technology Inc.
Phone No. Fax No.
Node ID#
PPAP#
480-792-4317
Yes NO
dimensional measurements material and functional tests appearance criteria statistical process package
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Approved Rejected
Other
n/a
n/a
Yes No n/a
N/A
Checking Aid Number Checking Aid Eng. Change Level Dated
Initial submission Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change(s) Sub-Supplier or Material Source Change
Correction of Discrepancy Parts produced at Additional Location
Level 1 - Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval Report) submitted to customer.
Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at organization's manufacturing location.
Weight (kg)
Pb-Free N/A N/A
Checking Aid Number Checking Aid Eng. Change Level DatedPb-Free N/A N/AChecking Aid Number Checking Aid Eng. Change Level Dated
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts, which were made by a process that meets all Production
Part Approval Process Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I further affirm that these samples were produced at the production rate of
___ hours. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for your review. I have noted any
480-792-4317
statistical process package
n/a
n/a
Microchip Technology has been an ISO/TS-16949 certified
supplier since 2003. “Quality Comes First’ is at the top
of the list of our Guiding Values, which provide the core
principles that define our culture and the way we do
business. Microchip’s Aggregate System uniquely support
our commitment to exceptional quality, demonstrating and
enterprise-wide dedication to continuous improvement
and fostering and environment where every employee is
responsible for quality.
www.microchip.com/quality
Microchip supports various automotive quality initiatives:
■ Zero Defect Initiatives
■ Advanced Product/Process Quality Planning (APQP)
■ AEC-Q100 Stress Testing
■ Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
■ 8D Reporting
■ Product Change Notifi cation