Specifications

40 Catalog WSC/WDC-4
Variable Frequency Drives
Impact of Variable Frequency Drives
The chart below illustrates the relative IPLV efficiencies of various McQuay options for a typical
500-ton selection. The chiller cost increases as the efficiency improves.
Comparative Efficiencies (kW/Ton)
.6
.5
.4
.3
WSC WDC WDC w/VFDWSC w/VFD
.505
.403
.365
.337
IPLV
Notes:
WSC = Single Compressor Centrifugal Chiller
WDC = Dual Compressor Centrifugal Chiller
VFD = Variable Frequency Drive
The IPLV values (defined on page 49) are ARI Certified Ratings based on ARI Standard 550/590-
1998, Standard for Water Chilling Packages Using the Vapor Compression Cycle. Full load is at
44°F chilled water temperature with 2.4 gpm/ton, 85°F entering condenser water temperatures
with 3 gpm/ton. Part load points of 75%, 50%, and 25% employ condenser water temperature
relief (reduction) per the standard.
General
Single and dual compressor units can be equipped with a variable frequency drive (VFD). A VFD
modulates the compressor speed in response to load and evaporator and condenser pressures as
sensed by the microprocessor. Due to the outstanding part load efficiency, and despite the small
power penalty attributed to the VFD, the chiller can achieve outstanding overall efficiency. VFDs
really prove their worth when there is reduced load combined with low compressor lift (lower
condenser water temperatures) dominating the operating hours.
The traditional method of controlling centrifugal compressor capacity is by inlet guide vanes.
Capacity can also be reduced by slowing the compressor speed and reducing the impeller tip
speed, providing sufficient tip speed is retained to meet the discharge pressure requirements. This
method is more efficient than guide vanes by themselves.
In actual practice a combination of the two techniques is used. The microprocessor slows the
compressor (to a fixed minimum percent of full load speed) as much as possible, considering the
need for tip speed to make the required compressor lift. Guide vanes take over to make up the
difference in required capacity reduction. This methodology provides the optimum efficiency
under any operating condition.