Manual

Report No.: C140428Z01-RP1
FCC ID: 2AAHXMXH-BT800 Page 7 of 60
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Compliance Certification Services.
4. FACILITIES AND ACCREDITATIONS
4.1 FACILITIES
All measurement facilities used to collect the measurement data are located at
No.10-1, Mingkeda Logistics Park, No.18, Huanguan South Rd.,
Guan Lan Town, Baoan District, Shenzhen, China
The sites are constructed in conformance with the requirements of ANSI C63.4:2009,
ANSI C63.7 and CISPR Publication 22. All receiving equipment conforms to CISPR
Publication 16-1, “Radio Interference Measuring Apparatus and Measurement Methods.”
4.2 ACCREDITATIONS
Our laboratories are accredited and approved by the following accreditation body
according to ISO/IEC 17025.
USA
A2LA
China
CNAS
The measuring facility of laboratories has been authorized or registered by the following
approval agencies.
USA
FCC
Japan
VCCI(C-3478, R-3135, T-652, G-624)
Canada
INDUSTRY CANADA
Taiwan
BSMI
Copies of granted accreditation certificates are available for downloading from our web
site, http://www.ccsrf.com
4.3 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for
tests performed on the EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2:
Parameter Uncertainty
Radiated Emission, 30 to 200 MHz
Test Site : 966(2)
+/-3.6880dB
Radiated Emission, 200 to 1000 MHz
Test Site : 966(2)
+/-3.6695dB
Radiated Emission, 1 to 8 GHz +/-5.1782dB
Radiated Emission, 8 to 18 GHz +/-5.2173dB
Conducted Emissions +/-3.6836dB
Band Width 178kHz
Peak Output Power MU +/-1.906dB
Band Edge MU +/-0.182dB
Channel Separation MU 416.178Hz
Duty Cycle MU 0.054ms
Frequency Stability MU 226Hz
This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately
the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2.
The measured result is above (below) the specification limit by a margin less than the
measurement uncertainty; it is therefore not possible to state compliance based on the
95% level of confidence. However, the result indicates that compliance (non-compliance)
is more probable than non-compliance) with the specification limit.