User's Manual

Table Of Contents
of Customer1’s processes receive 25% of the resource. This scenario assumes that the three processes
fully consume the resource allocated to their groups.
Figure 2 Balancing resource use between users
GroupA
Customer1
Customer2
Process1
Process2
Process3
HP-UX server
50%
25%25%
GroupB
Prioritizing resource use between users
Figure 3 illustrates how users’ access to resources can be prioritized using PRM. In this example,
two university departments both contributed to the purchase of a new computer. The math department
paid 25% of the cost, and the engineering department paid 75%. PRM groups are assigned
accordingly: 25% for the math PRM group MGroup and 75% for the engineering PRM group
EGroup. This implies that EGroup processes have priority over MGroup processes. Each group
has only one user: User1 is in MGroup; User2 is in EGroup. User1 is entitled to 25% of the
available resource, and User2 is entitled to 75%. This scenario assumes that the three processes
fully consume the resource allocated to their groups.
Figure 3 Prioritizing resource use between users
MGroup
User2
Process1
Process2
Process3
HP-UX server
75%
25%
EGroup
User1
Prioritizing resource use for applications
Figure 4 illustrates a situation where two users and an application are assigned to separate PRM
groups. User1 and User2 are respectively assigned to GroupA and GroupB. Both groups are
given 25%. The critical application is assigned to GroupC, which is given 50%. Because of its
greater resource allocation, GroupC takes priority over GroupA and GroupB. This scenario
assumes that the processes fully consume the resource allocated to their groups.
Why use HP Process Resource Manager? 15