Arbitration For Data Integrity in Serviceguard Clusters, July 2007
Arbitration for Data Integrity in Serviceguard Clusters
Summary
30
Summary
This paper has described a number of approaches to arbitration to
provide safety for data in high availability clusters. There are
advantages and disadvantages to each of the major approaches using a
lock disk, a quorum server, or arbitrator nodes.
Table 1 Comparison of Different Arbitration Methods
Arbitration
Mode
Advantages Disadvantages
Lock Disk • Does not require a
separate system.
• Disk can be used for
other purposes as well.
• Legacy method that has
been used for many
years.
• Requires separate disk hardware
that must be cabled to all nodes.
• Can only be used with clusters up
to 4 nodes.
• Not available on Linux.
• Acquiring the lock follows an
arbitration protocol, and this adds
to failover time.
• Use in extended distance clusters
requires dual lock disks, with a
slight risk of split brain.
Lock LUN • Does not require a
separate system.
• Disk can be used for
other purposes as well.
• Similar to HP-UX lock
disk.
• Requires separate disk hardware
that must be cabled to all nodes.
• Can only be used with clusters up
to 4 nodes.
• Acquiring the lock follows an
arbitration protocol, and this adds
to failover time.
• Dual lock LUNs are not
supported, including extended
clusters.