Arbitration For Data Integrity in Serviceguard Clusters, July 2007

Arbitration for Data Integrity in Serviceguard Clusters
Summary
30
Summary
This paper has described a number of approaches to arbitration to
provide safety for data in high availability clusters. There are
advantages and disadvantages to each of the major approaches using a
lock disk, a quorum server, or arbitrator nodes.
Table 1 Comparison of Different Arbitration Methods
Arbitration
Mode
Advantages Disadvantages
Lock Disk Does not require a
separate system.
Disk can be used for
other purposes as well.
Legacy method that has
been used for many
years.
Requires separate disk hardware
that must be cabled to all nodes.
Can only be used with clusters up
to 4 nodes.
Not available on Linux.
Acquiring the lock follows an
arbitration protocol, and this adds
to failover time.
Use in extended distance clusters
requires dual lock disks, with a
slight risk of split brain.
Lock LUN Does not require a
separate system.
Disk can be used for
other purposes as well.
Similar to HP-UX lock
disk.
Requires separate disk hardware
that must be cabled to all nodes.
Can only be used with clusters up
to 4 nodes.
Acquiring the lock follows an
arbitration protocol, and this adds
to failover time.
Dual lock LUNs are not
supported, including extended
clusters.