FW V06.XX/HAFM SW V08.02.00 HP StorageWorks SAN High Availability Planning Guide (AA-RS2DD-TE, July 2004)

Table Of Contents
Planning Considerations for Fibre Channel Topologies
110 SAN High Availability Planning Guide
Because of these problems, a fabric with a high ISL count is more difficult to
build. Note that the fabric problem is not directly related to the large number of
fabric elements but to the large number of ISLs associated with the elements.
Fabric build concerns currently limit the combined number of directors and
switches to about 24.
FCP and FICON in a Single Fabric
Fibre Channel Layer 4 (FC-4) describes the interface between Fibre Channel and
various upper-level protocols. FCP and FICON are the major FC-4 protocols. FCP
is the Fibre Channel protocol that supports the small computer system interface
(SCSI) upper-level transport protocol. FICON is the IBM successor to the
enterprise systems connection (ESCON) protocol and adds increased reliability
and integrity to that provided by the FCP protocol.
Because FCP and FICON are both FC-4 protocols, routing of Fibre Channel
frames is not affected when the protocols are mixed in a single fabric
environment. However, management differences in the protocols arise when a
user changes director or edge switch parameters through zoning or connectivity
control. In particular:
FCP communication parameters are port number and name-centric,
discovery-oriented, and assigned by the fabric, and they use the Fibre Channel
name server to control device communication.
FICON communication parameters are logical port address-centric, definition
oriented, and assigned by the attached host and they use host assignment to
control device communication.
In addition to OEM limitations not discussed in this publication, the
considerations that need to be evaluated when intermixing FCP and FICON
protocols are:
Director or Switch Management
Port Numbering Versus Port Addressing
Management Limitations
Features that Impact Protocol Intermixing
Protocol lntermixing Best Practices