User's Manual
Table Of Contents
- User Manual
- RAPID® v8.3
- Table of Contents
- Chapter 1
- Using This Guide
- Chapter 2
- Indications, Contraindications, Warnings, Cautions
- Chapter 3
- Welcome to PillCam Capsule Endoscopy
- Chapter 4
- Preparing for PillCam Capsule Endoscopy
- Preparing the Patient
- Preparing the Required Equipment
- Creating Patient Instructions for the Procedure
- General Patient Guidelines During the Procedure
- Performing Patient Check-in
- Fitting Equipment on the Patient
- Chapter 5
- Know Your PillCam Recorder
- Chapter 6
- Performing PillCam Capsule Endoscopy
- Chapter 7
- Creating RAPID Videos
- Chapter 8
- Reviewing and Interpreting RAPID Videos
- Loading a Study with the Study Manager
- Using the Study Manager
- Overview of the RAPID Interface
- Using RAPID to View a Video
- RAPID Video Files
- Working with Findings
- Creating a PillCam Capsule Endoscopy Report
- RAPID Atlas
- Lewis Score
- Generating a Report
- Appendix A1
- Installing RAPID Software
- Appendix A2
- Configuring RAPID Software
- Appendix A3
- PillCam Equipment Maintenance
- Appendix A4
- Troubleshooting
- Appendix A5
- Technical Description
- System Labeling
- Essential Performance
- Warnings
- Cautions
- System Specifications
- PillCam SB 2 Capsule
- PillCam SB 3 Capsule
- PillCam UGI Capsule
- PillCam COLON 2 Capsule
- Sensor Array PillCam Recorder DR2
- Sensor Array PillCam Recorder DR3
- PillCam Recorder DR2/DR2C
- Cradle PillCam Recorder DR2
- PillCam Recorder DR3
- PillCam Recorder DR3 SDHC Memory Card
- Cradle PillCam Recorder DR3
- DC Power Supply
- RAPID for PillCam Software
- Guidance and Manufacturer's Declarations
- Index
PillCam Capsule Endoscopy
20 Accuracy of the Device—COLON 2
Using the 6 mm or greater sized polyp threshold, the positive and negative percent agreements of CCE with
OC were, respectively, 68.8% (132/192, 95% CI 61.7-75.2%) and 81.3% (413/508, 95% CI 77.6-84.6%).
Using the 10 mm or greater sized polyp threshold, the positive and negative percent agreements were
64.9% (50/77, 95% CI 53.2-75.5%) and 92.9% (579/623, 95% CI 90.6-94.8%).
Following the completion of a colonoscopy when the polyp detected on CCE was not identified, the results
of the CCE evaluation were unblinded and the colonoscopy was repeated in a second attempt to identify the
polyp identified on CCE. The unblinded colonoscopy results for the >=6 mm threshold showed a 1% and
3% increase in the positive and negative percent agreement values, respectively. The unblinded
colonoscopy results for the >=10 mm threshold showed a 1% increase in the positive and negative percent
agreements.
i ii
Notes:
i. Five of ninety-five patients who per protocol should have undergone a second OC procedure were determined not to require it by
the physician.
ii. The reported positive and negative percent agreement of the unblinded analysis are potentially biased because OC was repeated
only on those patients with an initial CCE false positive finding and not also on those patients with an initial CCE true negative
finding based on the blinded OC evaluation.
Table 4: Observed Categorical Data, 10 mm Threshold
CCE
OC
negative positive
negative 579 27 606
positive 44 50 94
623 77 700
Table 5: Percent Agreement of CCE with OC
Percent
Agreement
Polyp Size Threshold
≥ 6 mm ≥ 10 mm
Positive
Percent
Agreement
(95% CI)
a
68.8% (132/
192)
95% CI
(61.7%,
75.2%)
64.9% (50/
77)
95% CI
(53.2%,
75.5%)
Negative
Percent
Agreement
(95% CI)
a
81.3% (413/
508)
95% CI
(77.6%,
84.6%)
92.9% (579/
623)
95% CI
(90.6%,
94.8%)
a. 95% CI based on Clopper Pearson