User manual
Digitaler Hochfrequenz Analyser HF38B
© Gigahertz Solutions GmbH, D-90579 Langenzenn Revision 2.3 Page 7
GHz cordless phones the ratio can be as
high as 1:100.), the higher the potential con-
tribution from a 2.4-GHz cordless phone sig-
nal to the total maximum value or the less
channels are being used by cellular phone
users.
Still today, some field meters only display
average values. They are of little help when
considering the potential health risks associ-
ated with pulse-modulated RF radiation be-
cause through the „averaging“ of steep RF
pulses, RF radiation exposure can be under-
rated up to a factor of 100 such as in 2.4-
GHz cordless phones.
Actual Measurements
Now the antenna is attached again to the
RF analyzer because objects (mass) directly
behind the RF analyzer also have an effect on
the testing result. Hold the RF analyzer with a
slightly outstretched arm. Your hand
should not reach too close to the antenna,
but stay near the bottom end of the RF ana-
lyzer.
In the area of a local maximum the position-
ing of the RF analyzer should be changed
until the effective power density (the most
interesting measurement value) can be lo-
cated. This can be achieved as follows:
- Through scanning „all directions“ to locate
the direction from which the major RF
emission(s) originate. Move your wrist from
right to left. For emission sources behind
your back, you have to turn around and
place your body again behind the RF ana-
lyzer.
- Through rotating the RF analyzer with at-
tached antenna around its longitudinal axis
to consider the polarization plane of the RF
radiation.
- Through changing the measurement posi-
tion („measurement spot“) to avoid meas-
uring exclusively in one spot, which might
accidentally have local or antenna-specific
cancellation effects.
Some manufacturers of field meters propa-
gate the idea that the effective power density
should be obtained by taking measurements
of all three axes and calculating the resultant.
Most manufacturers of professional testing
equipment, however, do not share this view.
In general, it is well accepted that expo-
sure limit comparisons should be based
on the maximum value emitted from the
direction of the strongest radiation sour-
ce.
When a 2.4-GHz telephone inside the house,
for instance, emits a similar level of microwa-
ves as a nearby cellular phone base station
outside the house, it could be helpful to first
turn off the 2.4-GHz telephone inside the
house to measure the exposure level origina-
ting from the outside. After also having mea-
sured the emission of the 2.4-GHz telephone
on its own, the sum of both measurement
values could be used for the exposure as-
sessment. Right now we have no clearly de-
fined testing protocol because according to
national standard-setting institutions - as
described earlier – quantitatively reliable, tar-
geted and reproducible measurements are
only possible under „free field conditions“
but not in indoor environments.
To be on the safe side, the RF exposure
comparison should be based on a value deri-
ved from multiplying the display value by the
factor 4.
This correction factor may appear extremely high
at first sight. As soon as put into perspective of professional
spectrum analyzers, which already use a factor of 2, however,
the relative nature of this factor becomes obvious.
Regardless of the measurement uncertainty
technically inherent to the RF analyzer, for
measuring cellular phone base stations it is
recommended that a factor of up to 4 is put
on the displayed measurement value in order
to take into account the potential maximum
power density at full usage of the network in
contrast to the minimum power density. The
minimum RF level occurs when only the con-
trol channel operates, whose signal strength
is unaffected by the number of phone calls
being placed at any given time. In order to
obtain the most realistic minimum value for
calculating the maximum exposure, it is sug-
gested to take measurements at different
times during the day, especially at known
low-traffic times such as Sunday morning or
the like.
Hint for Cellular Phone Users:
Cellular phone reception is still possible well below the strict exposure limits of the
Building Biology Guidelines for pulse-modulated RF radiation, that is power density
levels below 0.1µW/m² or 0.01 nW/cm², respectively.