Web Management Guide

Table Of Contents
Chapter 13
| Basic Administration Protocols
Ethernet Ring Protection Switching
– 464 –
Ethernet Ring Protection Switching
Note:
Information in this section is based on ITU-T G.8032/Y.1344.
The ITU G.8032 recommendation specifies a protection switching mechanism and
protocol for Ethernet layer network rings. Ethernet rings can provide wide-area
multipoint connectivity more economically due to their reduced number of links.
The mechanisms and protocol defined in G.8032 achieve highly reliable and stable
protection; and never form loops, which would fatally affect network operation and
service availability.
The G.8032 recommendation, also referred to as Ethernet Ring Protection
Switching (ERPS), can be used to increase the availability and robustness of
Ethernet rings. An Ethernet ring built using ERPS can provide resilience at a lower
cost and than that provided by SONET or EAPS rings.
ERPS is more economical than EAPS in that only one physical link is required
between each node in the ring. However, since it can tolerate only one break in the
ring, it is not as robust as EAPS. ERPS supports up to 255 nodes in the ring structure.
ERPS requires a higher convergence time when more that 16 nodes are used, but
should always run under 500 ms.
Operational Concept
Loop avoidance in the ring is achieved by guaranteeing that, at any time, traffic
may flow on all but one of the ring links. This particular link is called the ring
protection link (RPL), and under normal conditions this link is blocked to traffic. One
designated node, the RPL owner, is responsible for blocking traffic over the RPL.
When a ring failure occurs, the RPL owner is responsible for unblocking the RPL,
allowing this link to be used for traffic.
Ring nodes may be in one of two states:
Idle – normal operation, no link/node faults detected in ring
Protection – Protection switching in effect after identifying a signal fault
In Idle state, the physical topology has all nodes connected in a ring. The logical
topology guarantees that all nodes are connected without a loop by blocking the
RPL.
A link/node failure is detected by the nodes adjacent to the failure. These nodes
block the failed link and report the failure to the ring using R-APS (SF) messages.
This message triggers the RPL owner to unblock the RPL, and all nodes to flush their
forwarding database. The ring is now in protection state, but it remains connected
in a logical topology.
When the failed link recovers, the traffic is kept blocked on the nodes adjacent to
the recovered link. The nodes adjacent to the recovered link transmit R-APS (NR - no