Specification

Page

First issue: June 16, 2015

Revised:

Product Name: Dynamite Food &Succulent Cactus 18-6-8

SDS No. CF18-6-8

SAFETY DATA SHEET

There is a description in EU-RAR 49 (2004) that strong stimulation, mild edema, and strong

corneal opacity was observed by the test applying 50mg to rabbit eye. However, the

symptoms disappeared after 8 days. (GHS classification: classification 2B)

Though EDTA is classified as 2B in GHS classification, we have concluded that these

constituents are not classified as their concentration is not more than 10%.

Respiratory sensitivity :Not applicable No data

Skin sensitivity : Not applicable No data

Have the following such harmful information about the following materials is a constituent.

No data available. For the disodium salt of this substance, it is reported that 30% of guinea

pigs after 24 hours and 10% of guinea pigs after 7 days in a maximization test are positive in

EU-RAR 49 but it is said that there is no sensitivity by a different maximization test. (NITE

initial risk assessment report Ver.1.1, 14(2007))

(GHS classification: Can not be classified.)

As there are no sufficient data of the constituents, we have concluded that

classified.

Gem cell mutagenicity :Not classified

There is a hazard information such as the following for the following substances is a

constituent.

There is a description in (IUCLID) (2000) that it is negative by the Ames test as a

vitro mutagenicity test reported (GHS classification: Can not be classified because

there is no in vivo test of data.)

Negative results are reported in EU-RAR 49(2004) using disodium salt of this substance as

in vivo study by a dominant lethal test applying through drinking water administration to the

mouse (germ cells in vivo heritable mutagenicity test), a chromosome aberration test using

spermatogonial cells applying through intraperitoneal administration to the mouse

(reproductive cells in vivo mutagenicity test), a micronucleus test using bone marrow

applying through oral and intraperitoneal administration to the mouse (somatic cell in vivo

mutagenicity test). Also, in vitro test, negative results are reported in the Ames test using

this trisodium salt of this material and in mouse lymphoma assay test. (EU-RAR 49 (2004),

(Industrial Safety and Health Act, Mutagenicity Data c Appendix 2 edition (2000). In

addition, although there is a positive result report by chromosome aberration test using bone

marrow cells and spleen cells of mice with this substance (somatic cell in vivo mutagenicity

test) in NITE initial risk assessment report Ver.1.1, 14 (2007), we have not interpreted this is

not an enough evidence for the classification as the route of administration or applied

amount is not mentioned in the aforesaid reports and our expert advised that it is doubtful to

secure the reproducibility of these results. (GHS classification: Not classified)

As these constituents are not classified, we have concluded that these are not classified.