Specification

Page

First issue: June 16, 2015

Revised:

Product Name: Dynamite Food &Succulent Cactus 18-6-8

SDS No. CF18-6-8

SAFETY DATA SHEET

classified)

LD50 values in rats> 2000mg / kg (EU-RAR 49 (2004)), 2580,4500mg / kg (NITE initial risk

assessment report Ver.1.1, 14 (2007)). (GHS classification: Not classified)

As these constituents are not classified, we have concluded that these are not classified.

Acute toxicity(skin) :Not applicable No data

Acute toxicity(inhalation) :Not classified

There is harmful information, such as the following for the following substances is

a constituent.

Rat LC50 (4 hours) value:> 88.8mg / L (IUCLID, 2000). (GHS classification: Not classified)

Can not be classified in the lack of data. When inhale for 8 hour where fine powders

are saturated at 20 and 80 , no death is reported. (NITE initial risk assessment report

Ver.1.1, 14 (2007)) (GHS classification: Can not be classified)

Dermal corrosion / irritation :Not classified

Have the following such harmful information about the following materials is a constituent.

ICSC (J) (2001), HSDB (2005), HSFS (1998) and SITTIG (4th, 2002) there is a

description of that it might stimulate the skin, but there is no description of the specific case.

In addition, skin irritation has not been observed by two tests with rabbits. (IUCLID (2000)).

(GHS classification: Can not be classified)

Reported that there is no irritation in the Draize test of rabbit (NITE initial risk

assessment report Ver.1.1, (2007)), and in another test using a rabbit, it was reported that if

applied this material for 20 hours to ears of rabbit and observed a mild irritation after 24

hours. (EU-RAR 49 (2004)). (GHS classification: Not classified)

As these constituents are not classified, we have concluded that these are not classified.

Serious eye damage / irritancy :Not classified

Have the following such harmful information about the following materials is a constituent.

There was no changes observed, which corresponds to the irritation as per the irritation

criteria, by the eye irritation test using rabbits described in ECETOC TR 48 (1992). There is

a description in ICSC (J) (2001), HSDB (2005), HSFS (1998) that it is irritating to the

human eye, but there is no description of the specific case. (GHS classification: Not

classified)