Specifications

Message
56
57
58
Significance
The program name is expected in this field.
Too many dimensions caused a table overflow.
The symbol table overflowed; compilation
terminates.
59 The statement label may not be zero.
~o
61
There is no apparent exit from this program.
Unclosed
DO-implied list
62 An unformatted WRITE must have a list.
63
64
65
66
67
68
The name must be an integer variable or
integer constant.
The name
is not implicitly an integer variable.
A
RETURN statement may appear only in a
subroutine or function definition. A
STOP
statement is assumed.
Superflous information in this statement is
ignored.
This field
on the STOP card must have an octal
number not greater than 77777.
STOP is
assumed.
The field must be a positive integer.
69 The field must be an integer variable.
70
71
72
73
74
75
77
78
79
96769450 A
The field must be a statement label.
This form of the
ASSEM argument cannot
reference elements in
COMMON, EXTERNAL
names, or subprogram arguments.
This type of statement may not terminate a
DO loop.
This statement terminates a
DO loop when it
is not the last DO encountered.
This
GO TO jumps to itself.
A program consisting of only an
END card is
illegal.
Too many unique dummy parameter references
caused a compiler table overflow.
The label in a
DO statement must reference a
statement following it.
The maximum allowable number of nested
DOs
was exceeded. The DO loop may be implied in
a DO list.
Message
80
81
82
83
84
85
87
88
89
90
91
92
100
101
103
110
111
Significance
Subroutine argument table overflow caused by
a large number of declared parameters and
unique references to these parameters.
This formal argument
was previously specified
as another formal argument or the subprogram
name.
Too many formal arguments caused a compiler
table overflow.
The above name is not a variable or an array
element.
Two elements of the same array or common
block are assigned
to the same storage unit.
Blank common and formal arguments may not
be initialized with
DATA statements.
An array element in a BYTE, SIGNED BYTE,
DATA, or EQUIVALENCE statement either
has the wrong number of subscripts or the
subscript is out of range.
Too many EQUIVALENCE names caused a
compiler table overflow.
At least two elements must appear
in an
EQUIVALENCE statement.
The preceding equivalenced symbols have
overflowed the origin of common.
The
DATA statement field is not an integer,
real, double precision, or literal constant.
Missing terminating asterisk or quote in a
literal string as appropriate.
Catastrophic table overflow; compilation is
abandoned.
If the offending statement is
arithmetic or a logical IF, the statement
should be broken into two or more statements
and the program recompiled.
Two PROGRAM, FUNCTION, SUBROUTINE,
or BLOCK DATA statements in one program
unit; the second
is ignored.
The relative address argument in the ASSEM
statement requires an asterisk at the end of
the preceding instruction.
An overflow of the table used for symbol
references; subsequent references are not
listed
by the option S processor.
The index used in this subscripted variable
is in
conflict with the dimension declaration.
5-9