Zoom out Search Issue

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE [90] MARCH 2015
radiation from the rear of the driver, although the directivity
results can be less accurate with frequency [7].
ARRAYS OF DIRECTIONAL SOURCES
If multiple directional loudspeakers are available, then it becomes
possible to create multiple zones of sound. Multizone reproduc-
tion requires a large number of monopole loudspeakers. The use
of directional sources allows the production of multizone fields
using significantly fewer loudspeaker units. In effect, a large num-
ber of drivers are grouped into a small number of physical devices
to allow the creation of complex sound fields.
It has been shown that an array of
LNth order sources
operating in free-field conditions has a spatial Nyquist fre-
quency of approximately
N2 times that of the same geometry
monopole array [31]. Results better than free-field can be
achieved in a reverberant room by using the techniques dis-
cussed in [32]. In this case, the directional sources are able to
exploit room reflections to provide directions of arrival other
than those directly from the sources. The use of
L HOSs, each
of which can produce up to order N responses, can produce a
similar accuracy of a reconstructed field to ()L N21+ mono-
pole loudspeakers in the 2-D case, and ()L N 1
2
+ loudspeakers
in the 3-D case. For example, Figure 8 shows the sound field
reproduction error achieved using a circular array of five
higher-order loudspeakers in comparison with an array of 45
monopole sources. For a virtual source angle of 72° (the
desired source position is equal to the first loudspeaker posi-
tion), the error is similar to that produced by the monopole
sources. At the angle of 36° (the desired source halfway
between two loudspeakers), the error is about 10 dB higher
than the monopole case but still reasonably accurate, particu-
larly at low frequencies. Reproduction has been achieved over a
1-m diameter using only five loudspeaker units with room
dereverberation. The simulation is limited to 2-kHz bandwidth
for computational complexity reasons. The worst-case repro-
duction error will be below
10- dB up to around 3 kHz. The
bandwidth and reproduction radius of accurate reproduction
can be extended by using more sources and higher orders, cre-
ating sufficient space for multiple listeners listening to inde-
pendent sound fields.
The use of HOSs can be viewed as an optimization problem
with a constraint on the total number of loudspeaker units in the
room. The only way to improve reproduction in such a case is to
add capability to the existing loudspeakers. HOSs offer a practical
approach to providing the control of the high-spatial-dimension
sound fields that are required for creating multiple personal sound
zones. For example, the reproduction of sound in
Q zones of
radius ,r
0
up to a spatial frequency ,k
max
using L HOSs requires a
maximum order per source of
(.)
..N
L
Qk r 05
05
max 0
=
+
-
cm
(19)
For 8 kHz reproduction over regions of radius 0.2 m, the order is
N 10= for L 10= sources and N 6= for L 15= sources. Such
numbers are achievable in moderate- to large-sized rooms.
SUMMARY AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES
In this article, we presented, according to our involvement and
insights, the audio processing and loudspeaker design aspects
that support the goal of establishing personal sound zones. The
problems that have been explored include multizone sound con-
trol, wave-domain active room compensation, and directional
loudspeaker design, which allow for sound control over spatial
regions. A high-performance personal audio system would likely
address many of these aspects in its design. In sound field
control, interference mitigation and room compensation robust
to changes and uncertainty in the acoustic environment remain
as challenging problems. Yet future opportunities exist in
1) higher-order surround sound using an array of directional
sources and wave-domain active room compensation to perform
multizone sound control in reverberant enclosures and 2) per-
sonal audio devices using multiple sensors to establish personal
sound zones by efficiently canceling crosstalk and using distrib-
uted beamforming.
AUTHORS
Terence Betlehem (Terence.Betlehem@callaghaninnovation.govt.
nz) received the B.S., B.E., and Ph.D. degrees in telecommunica-
tions engineering from the Australian National University (ANU)
in 1998, 2000, and 2005 respectively. From 2005 to 2006, he was a
research fellow at the ANU Research School of Information Sci-
ences and Engineering and a visiting researcher at National Infor-
mation and Communication Technology Australia working in the
areas of spatial signal processing and wireless channel modeling.
Since 2007, he has worked at Callaghan Innovation (formerly
Industrial Research Limited) in Lower Hutt, New Zealand, in the
areas of spatial audio and wireless communications, where he is
currently a senior research engineer. His research interests
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
−50
−40
−30
−20
−10
0
Frequency (Hz)
Least Square Error (dB)
45 Omni
Sources
5 HOS, 36°
5 HOS, 72°
[FIG8] The least squares error of reproduction as a function of
frequency for an array of five fourth-order sources at 36˚ exactly
between a pair of loudspeakers (dashed) and 72˚ coinciding with
a loudspeaker (dashed), and a circular array of 45 omnidirectional
line sources (unbroken) in a 2-D rectangular room of dimensions
6.4 # 5 m and with wall reflection coefficients of 0.7.
Previous Page | Contents | Zoom in | Zoom out | Front Cover | Search Issue | Next Page
q
q
M
M
q
q
M
M
q
M
THE WORLD’S NEWSSTAND
®
Previous Page | Contents | Zoom in | Zoom out | Front Cover | Search Issue | Next Page
q
q
M
M
q
q
M
M
q
M
THE WORLD’S NEWSSTAND
®
_
__________________________