User's Manual

32
FCC RF EXPOSURE INFORMATION:
WARNING!! Read this information before using your
phone
In August 1986 the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) of the United States with its action in Report and
Outer FCC adopted an updated safety standard for human
exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic energy
emitted by FCC regulated transmitters. Those guidelines
are consistent with the safety standard previously set by
both U.S. and international standards bodies. The design of
this phone complies with the FCC guidelines and these
international standards. Use only the supplied or an
approved antenna. Unauthorized antennas modifications,
or attachments could impair call quality, damage the
phone, or result in violation of FCC regulations. Do not use
the phone with a damaged antenna. If a damaged antenna
comes into contact with the skin, a minor burn may result.
Please contact your local dealer for replacement antenna.
BODY-WORN OPERATION:
This device was tested for typical body-worn operations
with the back of the phone kept 1.5cm from the body. To
comply with FCC RF exposure requirements, a minimum
separation distance of 1.5cm must be maintained between
the user's body and the back of the phone, including the
antenna, whether extended or retracted. Third-party
belt-clips, holsters and similar accessories containing
metallic components shall not be used. Body-worn
accessories
that cannot maintain 1.5cm separation distance between
the user’s body and the back of the phone, and have not
been tested for typical body-worn operations may not
comply with FCC RF exposure limits and should be
avoided.
For more information about RF exposure, please visit the
FCC website at www.fcc.gov
Your wireless handheld portable telephone is a low power
radio transmitter and receiver. When it is ON, it receives
and also sends out radio frequency (RF) signals. In August,
1996, the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC)
adopted RF exposure guidelines with safety levels for
hand-held wireless phones. Those guidelines are consistent
with the safety standards previously set by both U.S. and
international standards bodies:
<ANSIC95.1> (1992) / <NCRP Report 86> (1986) /
<ICIMIRP> (1996)
Those standards were based on comprehensive and
periodic evaluations of the relevant scientific literature. For
example, over 120 scientists, engineers, and physicians
from universities, government health agencies, and