Operating instructions

- While the rear base plate widths of both planers are almost identical, the width of the
2003 Model blade is almost 1/4" wider than the Skil 100 stock blade. Our best guess is
that this tends to cause small blade marks in the foam. (Note that if the 2003 Model has
the blades adjusted improperly the width could be almost 1/2" wider than the Skill 100
or the blades could be adjusted off center. This would result in problems.)
- The depth adjustment mechanisms are totally different and the Skil 100 has been univer-
sally accepted as the best design ever.
- The Skill 100 starts a shallow cut with the front base plate very close to the cutter blade.
It appears this would result in a very, very accurate shallow cut. It also allows for far
more accurate shallow cuts on convex surfaces.
- The Skill 100 front base plate is very far from the blade with moderate to deep cuts. The
2003 Model is furthest from the front base plate with shallow cuts and closest with the
maximum depth cut. This is a significant difference and may require an adjustment to
shaping technique.
- The distance between the front base plate and rear base plate varies on the Skill 100
depending on the depth of cut. It is always the same on the 2003 Model. The distance
between the front base plate and the rear base plate is shorter on the 2003 Model than on
the Skil 100.
- Using the Skil 100 it is significantly easier to tell cutting depth by the sound of the planer
because it makes more noise.
- It appears the rear handle position of the Skil 100 is excellent and we did our best to copy
this position with the 2003 Model. (We could not copy it without incurring a significant
expense or we would have copied it.)
- The Model 2003 body width is slightly greater than the Skil 100.
- There are several Skil 100 motors. So far the 2003 Model’s power and RPM appears
adequate for shaping. The late model Skill 100 has more torque and higher feet per
minute blade performance than the 2003 Model. The performance of the 2003 Model
was improved with our special bearings and the new blade sharpening method so the
performance gap has been narrowed compared to the older Pro Model. Performance
will also be improved after the bearings have been broken in.
- By frequently using the Clark Foam blade sharpening service the effective power of the
2003 Model can be significantly increased relative to the common practice of using dull
blades on Skill 100 planers.
- The Model 2003 has a fan that blows the dust out of the planer. This allows a smaller
exhaust pipe and a weaker vacuum system. The Skil 100 does not have such a device.
The big disadvantage of the Model 2003 is the fact that it will jam a vacuum system hose
when the vacuum is turned off. The Skil 100 will normally blow the dust onto the work.
- The Skil 100 is more durable than the Model 2003.
- We estimate that a late model, brand new Skil 100 would sell for approximately ten
times the cost of a 2003 Model Clark Foam Planer.