Licensing Information

Open Source Used In USC Iuh R3.3 Application Software V3.3.11
80
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program
into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you
may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with
the library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General
Public License instead of this License. But first, please read
<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html>.
From:Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
Sent:18 September 2013 14:08
To:Damian Le Gresley (damlegre)
Subject:Re: dnsmasq licencing
Damian,
All the code in dnsmasq carries the following statement, so you elect to use the entire application under
the terms of GPLv2.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991, or
(at your option) version 3 dated 29 June, 2007.
BTW, what's a "small cell product"?
Cheers,
Simon.
On 18/09/13 14:03, Damian Le Gresley (damlegre) wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> We would like to use your dnsmasq application in one of our Small Cell
> products but it is not clear to us whether the GPLv2 or GPLv3 licencing
> terms stated in the two COPYING files are disjunctive or conjunctive.
> i.e. Can we choose whether to use it under GPLv2 licencing only, or are
> parts of it also licenced under GPLv3 and hence we must respect the most
> restrictive licence.
>
> I found your post from back in 2007 where you were asking for opinions
> on what should be done:
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2007q3/001566.html
>
> I cannot find the conclusion of this discussion but I think you chose