Specifications

CRP-C0036-01
12
2. Conduct and Results of Evaluation by Evaluation Facility
2.1 Evaluation Methods
Evaluation was conducted by using the evaluation methods prescribed in CEM Part 2
in accordance with the assurance requirements in CC Part 3. Details for evaluation
activities are report in the Evaluation Technical Report. It described the description of
overview of the TOE, and the contents and verdict evaluated by each work unit
prescribed in CEM Part 2.
2.2 Overview of Evaluation Conducted
The history of evaluation conducted was present in the Evaluation Technical Report as
follows.
Evaluation has started on October, 2005 and concluded by completion the Evaluation
Technical Report dated December, 2005. The evaluation facility received a full set of
evaluation deliverables necessary for evaluation provided by developer, and examined
the evidences in relation to a series of evaluation conducted. Additionally, the
evaluation facility directly visited the development and manufacturing sites on
November, 2005 and examined procedural status conducted in relation to each work
unit for configuration management, delivery and operation and lifecycle by
investigating records and staff hearing. Further, the evaluation facility executed
sampling check of conducted testing by developer and evaluator testing by using
developer testing environment at developer site on November, 2005.
2.3 Product Testing
Overview of developer testing evaluated by evaluator and evaluator testing conducted
by evaluator are as follows.
2.3.1 Developer Testing
1) Developer Test Environment
Test configuration performed by the developer is showed in the Table 2-1.