Other
5. LCA: Results
DESCRIPTION OF THE SYSTEM BOUNDARY (X = INCLUDED IN LCA; MND = MODULE NOT DECLARED)
PRODUCT STAGE
CONSTRUCTI
ON PROCESS
STAGE
USE STAGE
END OF LIFE STAGE
BENEFITS AND
LOADS
BEYOND THE
SYSTEM
BOUNDARIES
Raw material
supply
Transport
Manufacturing
Transport from the
gate to the site
Assembly
Use
Maintenance
Repair
Replacement
Refurbishment
Operational energy
use
Operational water
use
Deconstruction
demolition
Transport
Waste processing
Disposal
Reuse
Recovery
Recycling
potential
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
C1
C2
C3
C4
D
X
X
X
MND
X
MND
MND
MND
MND
MND
MND
MND
MND
MND
X
MND
X
RESULTS OF THE LCA - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Particleboard, coated with melamine impregnated
paper, per m²
Parameter
Unit
A1-A3
A5
C3
D
Global warming potential
[kg CO
2
Eq.]
8.83
0.94
15.01
5.26
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer
[kg CFC11Eq.]
4.28E7
1.04E9
4.33E9
7.26E7
Acidification potential of land and water
[kg SO
2
Eq.]
2.96E2
1.95E4
4.03E4
6.25E3
Eutrophication potential
[kg (PO
4
)
3
Eq.]
5.21E3
4.56E5
5.28E5
6.11E4
Formation potential of tropospheric ozone photochemical oxidants
[kg etheneEq.]
2.19E3
7.71E6
1.82E5
6.08E4
Abiotic depletion potential for nonfossil resources
[kg SbEq.]
3.06E5
2.66E8
6.20E8
5.81E7
Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources
[MJ]
126.81
0.34
1.77
129.25
RESULTS OF THE LCA - RESOURCE USE: Particleboard, coated with melamine impregnated paper, per
m²
Parameter
Unit
A1-A3
A5
C3
D
Renewable primary energy as energy carrier
[MJ]
54.73
0.00
0.22
2.96
Renewable primary energy resources as material utilization
[MJ]
164.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total use of renewable primary energy resources
[MJ]
219.60
0.00
0.22
2.96
Nonrenewable primary energy as energy carrier
[MJ]
107.82
0.36
2.05
125.90
Nonrenewable primary energy as material utilization
[MJ]
23.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total use of nonrenewable primary energy resources
[MJ]
130.89
0.36
2.05
125.90
Use of secondary material
[kg]
2.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
Use of renewable secondary fuels
[MJ]
36.90
0.00
0.00
128.95
Use of nonrenewable secondary fuels
[MJ]
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.65
Use of net fresh water
[m³]
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.04
RESULTS OF THE LCA – OUTPUT FLOWS AND WASTE CATEGORIES:
Particleboard, coated with melamine impregnated paper, per m²
Parameter
Unit
A1-A3
A5
C3
D
Hazardous waste disposed
[kg]
1.03E4
1.80E7
2.38E6
4.34E5
Nonhazardous waste disposed
[kg]
0.57
0.01
0.01
0.08
Radioactive waste disposed
[kg]
2.68E4
2.72E7
1.78E5
2.34E4
Components for reuse
[kg]
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Materials for recycling
[kg]
0.28
0.03
0.00
0.00
Materials for energy recovery
[kg]
0.00
0.00
10.70
0.00
Exported electrical energy
[MJ]
0.00
3.85
0.00
0.00
Exported thermal energy
[MJ]
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
6. LCA: Interpretation
Figure 1 illustrates the contribution of each life cycle
stage to the overall indicator results of the impact
assessment (impact from module A1A3 = 100 %) for
particleboard coated with melamineimpregnated
paper. The Figure illustrates that for the GWP, the
ODP and the ADP fossil, the benefits from the energy
recovery of coated particleboard are higher than the
impacts during the life cycle, notably the impacts from
production. For other impact categories, the benefits of
energy recovery lie between 2 % to 30 %, depending
on the impact category under consideration.
The global warming potential (GWP) is an indicator for
the contribution to climate change and is
quantified based on the emissions of gases that
absorb radiative forcing.
The production of the UF/MUF resins contribute about
45 % to the GWP (excluding biogenic carbon) caused
during production of uncoated particleboard. Further
contributions stem from the production of heat from
light fuel oil and natural gas (about 18 %) and from the
generation of electricity (about 10 %). Transport of raw
materials are responsible for about 9% of the GWP.
For particleboard coated with melamine impregnated
paper, 65 % of the GWP are caused during board
production, 35 % are associated with the production of
the melamine impregnated paper.
8 Environmental Product Declaration – Particleboard, coated