User Manual
Table Of Contents
- 1. General
- 1.1 System Description
- 1.2 Indications and Usage
- 1.3 Contraindications
- 1.4 Warnings and Precautions
- 1.4.1 Sterilization, Storage, and Handling
- 1.4.2 Device Implantation and Programming
- 1.4.3 Lead Evaluation and Connection
- 1.4.4 Follow-up Testing
- 1.4.5 Pulse Generator Explant and Disposal
- 1.4.6 Hospital and Medical Hazards
- 1.4.7 Home and Occupational Hazards
- 1.4.8 Cellular Phones
- 1.4.9 Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS)
- 1.4.10 Home Appliances
- 1.4.11 Home Monitoring®
- 1.5 Potential/Observed Effects of the Device on Health
- 1.6 Clinical Studies
- 1.6.1 Kronos LVT Study
- 1.6.2 Tupos LV/ATx Study
- 1.6.2.1 Study Overview
- 1.6.2.2 Methods
- 1.6.2.3 Summary of Clinical Results
- 1.6.2.4 Primary Endpoint 1: Six Minute Walk Test & QOL (Effectiveness)
- 1.6.2.5 Effectiveness Endpoint Analysis and Conclusions
- 1.6.2.6 Primary Endpoint 2: Complication-Free Rate (Safety)
- 1.6.2.7 Primary Safety Enpoint Analysis and Conclusions
- 1.6.2.8 Post-hoc Safety Analysis
- 1.6.2.9 Post hoc Safety Analysis Conclusion
- 1.6.2.10 Secondary Endpoint Results
- 1.6.2.11 Multi-site Poolability and Gender Analysis
- 1.6.2.12 Conclusions
- 1.6.3 Lumax HFT VV Clinical Study
- 1.6.4 TRUST Clinical Study
- 1.6.5 Deikos A+
- 1.7 Patient Selection and Treatment
- 1.8 Patient Counseling Information
- 1.9 Evaluating Prospective CRTD/ICD Patients
- 2. Device Features
- 2.1 SafeSync Telemetry
- 2.2 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
- 2.3 Sensing (Automatic Sensitivity Control)
- 2.4 Automatic Threshold Measurement (ATM)
- 2.5 Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Detection
- 2.6 Tachyarrhythmia Redetection
- 2.7 Tachyarrhythmia Termination
- 2.8 Tachyarrhythmia Therapy
- 2.9 Bradycardia Therapy
- 2.9.1 Bradycardia Pacing Modes
- 2.9.2 Basic Rate
- 2.9.3 Night Rate
- 2.9.4 Rate Hysteresis
- 2.9.5 Dynamic AV Delay
- 2.9.6 IOPT
- 2.9.7 Upper Tracking Rate
- 2.9.8 Mode Switching
- 2.9.9 PMT Management
- 2.9.10 VES Discrimination after Atrial Sensed Events
- 2.9.11 Rate-Adaptive Pacing
- 2.9.12 Pulse Amplitude
- 2.9.13 Pulse Width
- 2.9.14 Post Ventricular Atrial Refractory Period
- 2.9.15 PVARP after VES
- 2.9.16 Auto PVARP
- 2.9.17 Noise Response
- 2.9.18 Post Shock Pacing
- 2.10 EP Test Functions
- 2.11 Special Features
- 2.10.2.3 Transmitting Data
- 2.11.3.3 Types of Report Transmissions
- 2.11.3.4 Description of Transmitted Data
- 2.11.3.5 IEGM Online HDs
- 2.11.3.6 Scheduling Remote Follow-up
- 2.11.4 Real-time IEGM Transmission
- 2.11.5 Capacitor Reforming
- 2.11.6 Patient and Implant Data
- 2.11.7 System Status
- 2.11.8 HF Monitor Statistics
- 2.11.9 Holter Memory
- 2.11.10 Timing Statistics
- 2.11.11 Atrial Arrhythmias
- 2.11.12 Ventricular Arrhythmias
- 2.11.13 Sensor
- 2.11.14 Sensing
- 2.11.15 Impedances
- 2.11.16 Automatic Threshold
- 2.11.17 Asynchronous Pacing Modes
- 2.11.18 Far-Field IEGM for Threshold Testing (Leadless ECG)
- 2.11.19 Advanced AT/AF Diagnostics (Lumax 700/740 only)
- 2.11.20 Atrial NIPS (Lumax 700/740 & 600/640 only)
- 3. Sterilization and Storage
- 4. Implant Procedure
- 5. Follow-up Procedures
- 6. Technical Specifications
Lumax Technical Manual 49
1.6.3.2 Methods
The study primarily evaluates and compares the functional
benefits of the Lumax HF-T with OPT versus the Lumax HF-T
with SIM using an endpoint that includes both a 6-minute walk
(6MW) test and quality of life (QOL) measurement assessed
using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire
(MLWHFQ). As such, relevant measurements are completed 3
times for each patient: once at the baseline evaluation (up to 14
days after enrollment), once at the 1-month follow-up (30 days
after baseline) and once at the 2-month follow-up (30 days after
the 1-month follow-up). Baseline data is collected with the
Lumax HF-T programmed to SIM.
6MW testing was chosen as a meaningful measure of CRT
therapy effect on HF status because 6MW has been shown to
improve during chronic CRT therapy (Olsson LG, Swedberg K,
Clark AL et al. Six minute corridor walk test as an outcome
measure for the assessment of treatment in randomized, blinded
intervention trials of chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Eur
Heart J 2005; 26:778–793.) Example improvements of 6MW
include increase in the range of 20 meters.
In this trial, the intent was to detect any loss of CRT benefit by
assessing the incidence of HF “worsening”, defined as reduction
of 35 meters distance on 6MW during CRT with V-V
programmability and optimization compared to during CRT
without V-V programmability and optimization.
QOL testing was chosen as a meaningful measure of CRT
therapy effect on HF status because QOL has been shown to
improve during chronic CRT therapy (Albouaini K, Egred M, Rao
A, et al. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy: evidence based
benefits and patient selection. Eur J Intern Med. 2008
May;19(3):165-72) Example magnitude improvements of QOL
include change in the range of 10 points.
In this trial, the intent was to detect any loss of CRT benefit by
assessing the incidence of HF “worsening”, defined as increase
of 10 points in QOL score by MLWHFQ during CRT with V-V
programmability and optimization compared to during CRT
without V-V programmability and optimization.
Worsening in the trial was defined as either a worsening (as
defined) in 6MW or in QOL score during CRT with V-V
programmability and optimization.