User manual

US 8,510,424 B2
Page 3
“Server Technology’s Reply to APC’s Response to Server Technolo
gy’s Proposed Order on Claim Construction,” Server Technology,
Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3 :06-CV
00698-LRH-VPC, 13 pp. (Jan. 12, 2009).
“American Power Conversion Corporation’ s Motion for Leave to File
a Surreply to Server Tech.’s Reply Brief on Claim Construction,”
Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corpration,
Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 3 pp. (Jan. 22, 2009).
“Server Technology’s Response in Opposition to APC’s Motion to
File a Surreply to Server Technology’s Reply Brief on Claim Con
struction,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion
Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 9 pp. (Feb. 7,
2009).
“Server Technology’s Response in Opposition to APC’s Proposed
Order on Claim Construction,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American
Power Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH
VPC, 23 pp. (Jan. 6,2009).
“American Power Conversion Corporation’s Surreply to
Server Tech. ’s Reply Brief on Claim Construction,” Server Technol
ogy, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation, Case No.
3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 5 pp. (Jan. 22, 2009).
“Claim Construction Order,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American
Power Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH
VPC, 41 pp. (Apr. 19,2010).
“Server Technology, Inc.’ s Motion for Leave to File Instanter Second
Amended Complaint,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power
Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 112
pp. (May 5, 2010).
“APC’s Answer, Af?rmative Defences, and Counterclaims to STI’s
Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Demand
for Jury Trial,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conver
sion Corporation, Case No. 3 :06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 22 pp. (Oct.
8, 2010).
Server Technology, Inc ., “Sentry Operations Remote Power Manager
User’s Manual (Preliminary),” 54 pp., Dec. 1999, Server Technology,
Inc., Reno, NV, USA.
Server Technology, Inc ., “Sentry Operations Remote Power Manager
Operations Manual,” 59 pp., Feb. 2000, Server Technology, Inc.,
Reno, NV, USA.
“APC’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and
Invalidity,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion
Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 2pp. (Nov. 4,
2010).
“APC’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion for Summary
Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity” and Exhibits 1-21;
Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation,
Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 708 pp., (Nov. 4, 2010).
Detailed Request for Inter PaItes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C.
§§311-318 and 37 CFR. §1.902 et Seq. dated Nov. 12, 2010; Reex
amination Control No. 95/001,485; 60 pp.
Order Granting Request for Inter PaItes Reexamination dated Jan. 15,
2011; Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Jan. 15, 2011; Reexamination Control No.
95/001,485; USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Oct. 20, 2010; US. Appl. No. 11/548,175;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Jan. 31, 2011; US. Appl. No. 11/548,201;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Jan. 10, 2011; US. Appl. No. 11/548,187;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Nov. 2, 2010; US. Appl. No. 11/458,988;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Jan. 25, 2011; US. Appl. No. 11/459,011;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Dec. 29, 2010; US. Appl. No. 11/370,489;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Jul. 21, 2010; US. Appl. No. 11/126,092;
USPTO.
Of?ce Action dated Aug. 10, 2010; US. Appl. No. 11/243,701;
USPTO.
“APC’ s Amended Answer, Af?rmative Defenses, and Counterclaims
to STI’s Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement;
Demand for Jury Trial and Exhibits A-F,” Server Technology, Inc. v.
American Power Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV
00698-LRH-VPC, 88 pp. (Jan. 18, 2011).
“Plaintiff Server Technology Inc.’s Answer to Amended Counter
claims; Jury Demand,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power
Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 23
pp. (Feb. 1,2011).
“American Power Conversion Corporation’ s Final Invalidity Conten
tions and Exhibits A-D,” Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power
Conversion Corporation, Case No. 3:06-CV-00698-LRH-VPC, 165
pp. (Feb. 4, 2011).
Of?ce Action dated Jun. 22, 2012; US. Appl. No. 12/853,193;
USPTO; 11 pp.
Of?ce Action dated May 3, 2012; US. Appl. No. 13/214,050;
USPTO; 12 pp.
Of?ce Action dated Mar. 13, 2012; US. Appl. No. 13/091,082;
USPTO; 47 pp.
Of?ce Action dated Mar. 16, 2012; US. Appl. No. 12/963,538;
USPTO; 50 pp.
Of?ce Action dated Apr. 18, 2012; US. Appl. No. 11/126,092;
USPTO; 28 pp.
Of?ce Action dated Mar. 6, 2012; US. Appl. No. 12/965,563;
USPTO; 20 pp.
American Power Conversion Corporation; Masterswitch VM Power
Distribution Unit User Guide; 1999; 51 pp.
American Power Conversion Corporation; MasterSwitch VM Power
Distribution Unit Installation and Quick Start Manual; 2000; 20 pp.
American Power Conversion Corporation; PowerNet SNMP Man
agement Information Base (MIB) v3.1.0 Reference Guide; 1999; 48
PP
Bay Technical Associates, Inc .; download of www.BayTech.net from
web.archive.org; 1997; 8 pp.
Bay Technical Associates, Inc.; Owner’s Manual for BayTech
Remote Power Control Unit for Models RPC-2, RPC-2A, RPC-2
MD01, RPC3-15 Amp, RPC3-20 Amp, RPC-3A, RPC-4, RPC-5,
RPC-7, RPC-21; Jan. 2000; 80 pp.
M2 Communications Ltd. M2 Presswire; BayTech’s vertically
mounted power strip helps network managers keep equipment up and
running; Nov. 19, 1999; 1 p.
Systems Enhancement Corporation; Power Administrator 800:
User’s Manual; 1996; 50 pp.
Of?ce Action dated Jan. 31, 2011; US. Appl. No. 11/548,201;
USPTO; 30 pp.
Of?ce Action dated Mar. 29, 2012; Reexamination Control No.
95/001,485; USPTO; 103 pp.
Server Technology, Inc.; “Patent Owner’s Response to Non-Final
Of?ce Action”; Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; May 29,
2012; 56 pp.
Carrel W. Ewing; “Second Declaration of Carrel W. Ewing Under 37
CFR §1.132”; Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; May 29,
2012; 140 pp.
Michael B. Aucoin; “Second Declaration of B. Michael Aucoin
Under 37 CFR 1.132”; Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; May
29,2012; 58 pp.
Chris Hardin; “Second Declaration of Chris Hardin Under 37 CFR
1.132”; Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; May 29, 2012; 9 pp.
KC Mares; “Second Declaration ofKC Mares Under 37 CFR 1.132”;
Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; May 29, 2012; 5 pp.
Michael R. Henson; “Declaration of Michael R. Henson Under 37
CFR §1.132”; Reexamination Control No. 95/001,485; May 29,
2012; 30 pp.
American Power Conversion Corporation; “Notice of Second Of?ce
Action in Reexamination Proceedings,” Server Technology, Inc. v.
American Power Conversion Corporation; Case No. 3:06-CV
00698-LRH-VPC; Apr. 10, 2012; 87 pp.
Server Technology, Inc.; “STI’s Response to APC’s Notice of Second
Of?ce Action in Reexamination Proceedings,” Server Technology,
Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corporation; Case No. 3 :06 -CV
00698-LRH-VPC; Apr. 18, 2012; 5 pp.
Interworking Labs Releases New, Extended SNMP Test Suite with
Windows NT and Windows 95 Support, Interworking Labs, pp. 1-2,
Jul. 15, 1996*