User guide

bn_bomprocess Messages
D-4: Error Messages
NEW_BOM_TYPE keyword not specified in CFG file
This is a required parameter, specified as
NEW_BOM_TYPE VL_SCHEM_EXTRACT
.
If you’re not an expert, make sure it’s spelled
VL_SCHEM_EXTRACT.
See
The
Configuration File
on page 5-16.
OLD_BOM_TYPE keyword not specified in CFG file
You need to specify
OLD_BOM_TYPE SAP_REPORT
in your configuration file.
Partslist tool did not complete successfully
The Viewlogic Part Lister reports a number of non-zero completion status
values. We don’t know what they all mean, but they’re not good.
Partslist tool not found in path <your_env_path>. Make sure the
Viewlogic tool suite is in your path.
You have set your config file to say
NEW_BOM_TYPE VL_SCHEM_EXTRACT.
Viewlogic isn’t in your UNIX search path. Use the command
add module
viewlogic
(see
Setting up Your Environment
on page 2-2) or otherwise modify
your path. Perhaps you need to run
mechbom
instead, or use a different
config file.
qty <counted_ref_des> does not match derived qty <expected_total>
The quantity (count) of reference designators doesn’t match the total expected
from the count of parts that specify them.
Unknown part format for <part_number> Exit.
The script looks on the EDA data servers and tries to find your part numbers
(perhaps as updated, deleted, or released) in all the relevant subdirectories in
/dra/rel
, but can’t figure out which revision scheme applies or how to
generate revved subdirectory names for your legacy part number.
Warnings
<count> quantity for part number <part_num> were removed. Depop
attribute associated with <part_number>’s _refdes is a multi-part
package. REVIEW your design to make sure DEPOP is valid.
Perhaps a depop was found on a slot part when not all slots were depoped.
Component Kit Rev found on Server: <920_number> does not match that
found in MRP system <number_found_in_SAP>.
The higher level assembly, e.g., your 920 number, was found as a rev in the
EDA server databases, but its rev doesn’t match its last rev in SAP.