Product Information

7
Elettromedia
62018 Potenza Picena (MC) Italy
T [phone] - F [phone]
elettromedia.com
audison.com
All specications subject to change without notice_19.A
When addressing scenarios of OEM audio systems integration,
the two approaches described above both have PROs and CONs.
Benets and limitations must be assessed in the design and
testing phases on the target system.
Automatic routing is the simplest and most automated and
provides the ability to reduce the complexity of the system to the
ideal stereo case or managing systems up to 5.1 fronts (front (L,
R), rear (L, R), central and SUB). This approach generally works
well in factory systems that are not too complex and / or not
altered by algorithms to emphasize sound. In such cases, the
reconstruction of the stereo fronts (sum of the limited signals in
the band) and subsequent compensation (time alignments) and
flattening (in form and phase), brings optimal results and allows
the user to redesign the system outputs arbitrarily.
Pass-through is more suitable when OEM systems are heavily
altered by audio algorithms to increase the perception of audio
quality (referred to by car manufacturers as 3D, surround, spatial,
etc.). Thanks to the direct connection between input and output,
the pass-through approach allows the conguration of the
original audio system to remain unaltered, supporting systems
up to 7.2 (PASS-THROUGH) and even beyond (EXTENDED PASS
THROUGH). In such cases, the SW does not make any sum of the
input channels, it alters its characteristics (it does not carry out
the de-equalization), exploiting the greater power (amplication),
efciency (speakers) and control (DSP, limited to EQ and TA) to
improve the audio performance of the standard system. The SW,
however, carries out an analysis of the input signals very useful
to the user during the setup phase, displaying the time delays
and cut-off frequencies of the OEM system without the use of
measuring instruments.
FOCUS ON NEW ROUTING CAPABILITIES
PASS-THROUGH VS AUTOMATIC