Specifications
PENTIUM® PRO PROCESSOR AT 150, 166, 180, and 200 MHz E
48
Since Ref8N is not the worst case network, and is
expected to be modeled without many real system
effects (e.g., inter-trace crosstalk, DC & AC losses),
the required signal quality is slightly different than
that specified in Section 4.1.3 of this document.
The signal quality criterion for an acceptable driver
design is that the signals produced by the driver (at
its fastest corner) at all Ref8N receiver
pads
must
remain outside of the shaded areas shown in
Figure 30. Simulations must be performed at both
device and operating extremes: fast process corner
at high VCC and low temperature, and slow process
corner at low VCC and high temperature, for both the
rising and falling edges. The clock frequency should
be at the desired maximum (e.g. 66.6 MHz, or
higher), and the simulation results should be
analyzed both from a quiescent start (i.e., first cycle
in a simulation), and when preceded by at least one
previous transition (i.e. subsequent simulation
cycles).
The boundaries of the keep-out area for the Lo-to-Hi
transition are formed by a vertical line at the start of
the receiver setup window (a distance T
SU
’ from the
next clock edge), an 0.3V/ns ramp line passing
through the intersection between the V
REF
+100 mV
level (the 100 mV is assumed extra noise) and the
beginning of the setup window, a horizontal line at
V
REF
+300 mV (which covers 200 mV of specified
overdrive, and the 100 mV margin for extra noise
coupled to the waveform), and finally a vertical line
behind the Clock at T
HD
’. The keep-out zone for the
Hi-to-Lo transition uses analogous boundaries in the
other direction. Raising V
REF
by 100 mV is assumed
to be equivalent to having 100 mV of extra noise
coupled to the waveform giving it more downward
ringback, such coupled noise could come from a
variety of sources such as trace-to-trace PCB
coupling.
T
SU
’ is the receiver‘s setup time plus board clock
driver and clock distribution skew and jitter, plus an
additional number that is inherited from the driver’s
internal timings (to be described next). Since the I/O
buffer designer will most likely be simulating the
driver circuit alone, certain delays that add to T
CO
,
such as: on-chip clock phase shift, clock distribution
skew, and jitter, plus other data latch or JTAG delays
would be missing. It is easier if these numbers are
added to T
SU
, yielding T
SU
’ making the driver
simulation simpler. For example, assume T
SU
to be
2.8 ns, PCB clock generation and distribution skew
plus jitter to be 1 ns, and unmodeled delays in the
driver to be typically about 0.8 ns, this yields a total
T
SU
’ = 4.6 ns.