Technical data

DATA CENTER and CAMPUS NETWORKS DEPLOYMENT GUIDE
Deploying Brocade Networks with Microsoft Lync Server 2010 39 of 52
Overall, the test was successful. By implementing a Microsoft Lync Server 2010 on a Brocade network infrastructure,
customers can feel confident that they can have a successful deployment. In addition, the call quality and
experience are significantly better than Microsoft Communication Server 2010. Details are provided below (scores
are averaged to summarize the results).
Table 7. Summary of Test Results
Average Score
With
Average
Jitter
Average
Delay
Average
Packet Loss
Average
MOS
Audio
No load/packet loss
1.07
12.07
0.00
4.07
5% packet loss
1.30
1.00
3.00
3.91
15% packet loss
1.33
45.17
14.83
3.84
25% packet loss
1.50
51.50
26.00
4.07
HQ to all sites using soft
client
80% pipe full
1.00
7.00
0.00
4.11
No load/packet loss
1.33
42.00
0.00
4.10
10% packet loss
1.50
63.50
10.00
3.86
15% packet loss
1.50
43.00
15.33
3.82
HQ to all sites using
Polycom CX600
80% pipe full
1.00
16.25
0.00
4.12
No load/packet loss
1.00
6.50
0.00
4.10
80% pipe full
1.00
9.75
0.00
4.11
San Francisco to all sites
using soft client
15% packet loss
1.50
53.25
15.00
3.91
80% pipe full
1.00
20.00
0.00
4.14
San Francisco to all sites
using Polycom CX600
15% packet loss
2.50
49.50
15.00
3.83
Austin to all sites using
soft client
15% packet loss
1.50
45.75
15.00
3.98
Austin to all sites using
Polycom CX600
15% packet loss
2.00
58.67
14.83
3.92
No load/packet loss
1.50
54.50
0.00
4.10
New York to all sites
using soft client
15% packet loss
1.75
57.63
14.88
3.96
No loss
1.50
62.00
0.00
4.10
10% packet loss
1.50
63.50
10.00
3.86
New York to all sites
using Polycom CX600
15% packet loss
1.60
60.60
15.00
3.86
Video
HQ to all sites using soft
client
5% packet loss
4.83
30.67
5.83
4.10
San Francisco to all sites
using soft client
5% packet loss
3.50
27.25
5.75
4.07
Austin to all sites using
soft client
5% packet loss
5.25
45.25
5.75
4.08